Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X Notebook rövid értékelés
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m (érték szerinti rendezés) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X (jseb) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 (jseb) | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m (érték szerinti rendezés) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X (jseb) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T (jseb) | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 (jseb) | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fényerő megoszlás: 91 %
Centrumban: 215 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 694:1 (Fekete: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.81% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.59% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X AU Optronics AUO213D B140HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T AU Optronics AUO272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ AUO B133HAN04.1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 AU Optronics B140HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK Chi Mei CMN14A7, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 50% | 71% | 1% | 11% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 36.59 | 54.8 50% | 64.2 75% | 36.97 1% | 40.74 11% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 55 | 82.3 50% | 90.6 65% | 55.6 1% | 60.6 10% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37.81 | 56.6 50% | 65.3 73% | 38.2 1% | 42.15 11% | |
| Response Times | -3% | 10% | -21% | -9% | 1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 42.8 ? -2% | 32 ? 24% | 50 ? -19% | 42 ? -0% | 43 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 24.8 ? -3% | 25 ? -4% | 29.6 ? -23% | 28 ? -17% | 23 ? 4% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||||
| Screen | 60% | 40% | 33% | 15% | -27% | |
| Brightness middle | 215 | 385 79% | 360 67% | 375 74% | 230 7% | 249 16% |
| Brightness | 208 | 350 68% | 337 62% | 358 72% | 226 9% | 235 13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 86 -5% | 86 -5% | 87 -4% | 86 -5% | 87 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.17 45% | 0.22 29% | 0.39 -26% | 0.2 35% | 0.44 -42% |
| Contrast | 694 | 2265 226% | 1636 136% | 962 39% | 1150 66% | 566 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 4.17 26% | 5.21 7% | 4.6 18% | 5.07 9% | 9.47 -69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.29 | 7.61 33% | 8.85 22% | 8.8 22% | 10.07 11% | 15.41 -36% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 5.39 -28% | 6.23 -48% | 4 5% | 3.64 13% | 10.22 -143% |
| Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.12 104% | 2.5 88% | 2.34 94% | 2.46 89% | 2.34 94% |
| CCT | 6564 99% | 7404 88% | 6506 100% | 7304 89% | 6521 100% | 11451 57% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35 | 62.7 79% | 59 69% | 57.9 65% | 35 0% | 39 11% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 55 | 99.8 81% | 90 64% | 88.7 61% | 55 0% | 57 4% |
| Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | 36% /
50% | 40% /
42% | 6% /
24% | 2% /
9% | -5% /
-16% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Megjelenítési válaszidők
| ↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 8 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 16 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő jó reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, de túl lassú lehet a versenyképes játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
| 42 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 18 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 24 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és nem lesz kielégítő a játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (32.8 ms). | ||
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
| Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3503 pontok | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4385 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X Liteonit CV3-8D512 | Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ LiteOn CV1-8B512 | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Liteonit CV3-8D512 | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -14% | 14% | 19% | 20% | 56% | |
| Read Seq | 471 | 447.6 -5% | 502 7% | 484.1 3% | 507 8% | 1131 140% |
| Write Seq | 398.3 | 309.4 -22% | 418.9 5% | 449.8 13% | 309.5 -22% | 311.4 -22% |
| Read 512 | 295.1 | 265.9 -10% | 341.3 16% | 399.1 35% | 409.5 39% | 685 132% |
| Write 512 | 283.3 | 275.2 -3% | 389.7 38% | 355.1 25% | 308.3 9% | 276.3 -2% |
| Read 4k | 24.14 | 18.89 -22% | 29.69 23% | 33.44 39% | 36.24 50% | 39.63 64% |
| Write 4k | 66 | 75.1 14% | 86.8 32% | 67.5 2% | 93.3 41% | 133.9 103% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 284.3 | 142.2 -50% | 301.3 6% | 368.5 30% | 394.5 39% | 399.7 41% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 260.2 | 228.9 -12% | 211.2 -19% | 280.6 8% | 241.6 -7% | 245.6 -6% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1643 pontok | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5839 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
| Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ | |
| Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
| alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 57.2 | 28.7 | 24 | 7.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 11.2 | 8 | 3.8 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 18.9 | 11.6 | 4.7 |
Zajszint
| Üresjárat |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.4 dB(A) |
| Terhelés |
| 31.5 / 31.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról) környezeti zaj: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 0.42 / 0.53 Watt |
| Üresjárat | 4.9 / 7.4 / 9.2 Watt |
| Terhelés |
34 / 32.2 Watt |
   
| |
Kulcs:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit CV3-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ 6500U, HD Graphics 520, LiteOn CV1-8B512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit CV3-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 6500U, GeForce 940M, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | 10% | 2% | -7% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.9 | 3 39% | 4.1 16% | 4.9 -0% | 3.8 22% | 5.8 -18% |
| Idle Average * | 7.4 | 6.3 15% | 6.7 9% | 7.3 1% | 7.2 3% | 7.3 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.2 | 7.5 18% | 7.4 20% | 9.4 -2% | 7.6 17% | 8.5 8% |
| Load Average * | 34 | 36 -6% | 32.4 5% | 26 24% | 40 -18% | 30.6 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 32.2 | 31.5 2% | 32.4 -1% | 36 -12% | 52 -61% | 32.5 -1% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 6500U, GeForce 940M, 30 Wh | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akkumulátor üzemidő | 55% | 27% | 9% | -35% | 35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 707 | 1225 73% | 1028 45% | 675 -5% | 346 -51% | 944 34% |
| H.264 | 343 | 400 17% | 246 -28% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 354 | 612 73% | 472 33% | 392 11% | 257 -27% | 436 23% |
| Load | 96 | 115 20% | 99 3% | 109 14% | 64 -33% | 141 47% |
Pro
Kontra
Az Acer Swift 3 sikeres belépő a subnotebook szegmensben. Jó minőségű alumínium házát nem sok kritika érheti. Esetleg a karbantartáshoz szükséges hozzáférhetőség lehetne jobb. A beviteli eszközök meglepően jók, főleg a touchpad, amely a különféle több ujjas gesztusokat is remekül értelmezett. Ez a funkció ajánlható irodai társsá teszi a 14 inches rendszert. Az első probléma a géppel a kijelző, amely szerintünk egyszerűen nem elég világos. A korábban említett Asussal összehasonlítva látható, hogy ebben az árfekvésben a noteszgépek világosabb paneleket kaptak. Amit viszont nagyon szerettünk a Swift 3-ban, az az, hogy minden helyzetben jó teljesítményt mutat. Még az extrém terhelést is jól viselte a teszt modell. A melegedés, és a ventilátorok működése sem lépett túl a kényelmesen. Egyedül az akkumulátor üzemideje marad el sok vetélytársáétól.
Nem hibátlan, de példás: az Acer Swift 3 meggyőző eszköz irodai és multimédiás szerepben.
Amennyiben több pénzt tudnak áldozni vásárláskor, úgy érdemes egy pillantást vetniük a Dell XPS 13-ra. Kiváló kijelzőjének, hosszabb üzemidejének és jobb grafikai teljesítményének köszönhetően az egy kiemelkedő minőségű alternatíva. Ezen kívül Thunderbolt 3 port és a gyors PCIe is segíti a szerény csatlakozókínálat bővítését. Az Asus ZenBook pedig különösen azon felhasználók számára lehet érdekes, akik sokat utaznak készülékükkel. Sokkal jobb üzemideje mellé világosabb kijelzője is van.
Az Asus ZenBook összes előnye igaz az Acer Aspire S 13-ra is, amely árban is hasonló.
Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.
Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X
- 12/14/2016 v6 (old)
Nino Ricchizzi
Price comparison
