Notebookcheck Logo

Apple iPad 6 2018 Tablet rövid értékelés

Már Pencil támogatással is. Az Apple frissítette az iPad-et, és új lapkakészlettel, valamint Apple Pencil támogatással látta el a tabletet. Utóbbi eddig a Pro modellek számára volt fenntartva. Ezt leszámítva nem sok újítás került bele, és ez látható a 2018-as iPad értékeléséből is.
Apple Tablet
Apple iPad 6 2018 (iPad Széria)
Processzor
Apple A10 Fusion 4 x 2.3 GHz, APL1021 Hurricane / Zephyr
Grafikus adapter
Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR
Memória
2048 MB 
Kijelző
9.70 hüvelyk 4:3, 2048 x 1536 pixel 264 PPI, multitouch, natív tolltámogatás, IPS, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB NVMe, 32 GB 
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, Audió csatlakozók: headset, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, Fényerő érzékelő, Szenzorok: 3 tengelyes giroszenzor, gyorsulásmérő, barométer, Strom, USB és HDMI a Lightning Port-on keresztül
Hálózat
Bluetooth 4.2
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.5 x 240 x 169.5
Akkumulátor
32.4 Wh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Apple iOS 11
Camera
Webkamera: f2.4, 1080p videók, nincs OIS
Elsődleges kamera: 8 MPix
Másodlagos kamera: 1.2 MPix FaceTime f2.2 720p videók
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereo, alsó oldalon, 12 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Megjelent
03/29/2018
Súly
469 g
Ár
349 Euro
Megjegyzés: A gyártó különböző beszállítóktól származó alkatrészeket használhat, beleértve a hasonló specifikációjú kijelzőpaneleket, meghajtókat vagy memóriastickeket.

 

Size Comparison

305.7 mm 220.6 mm 6.9 mm 677 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 6.1 mm 469 g240 mm 169.5 mm 7.5 mm 469 g240 mm 169.5 mm 7.5 mm 478 g203.2 mm 134.8 mm 6.1 mm 304 g158.4 mm 78.1 mm 7.5 mm 202 g143.6 mm 70.9 mm 7.7 mm 174 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s +14%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
514 MBit/s +3%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
500 MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
497 MBit/s -1%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
389 MBit/s -22%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
374 MBit/s -25%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
354 MBit/s -29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
915 MBit/s +61%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
914 MBit/s +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s +8%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
570 MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
530 MBit/s -7%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
528 MBit/s -7%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
465 MBit/s -18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s -62%
Contrast and sharpness main camera
Contrast and sharpness main camera
Color accuracy main camera, reference colors in the lower half
Color accuracy main camera, reference colors in the lower half
Contrast and sharpness front camera
Contrast and sharpness front camera
Color accuracy front camera, reference colors in the lower half
Color accuracy front camera, reference colors in the lower half
534
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 538 cd/m² (Nits) Átlag: 513.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.1 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 92 %
Centrumban: 530 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 869:1 (Fekete: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
ColorChecker - Color Accuracy
A Delta E 2000 (ΔE) eredmény két szín, a mért és a valós szín különbségének mérőszáma. Minél kisebb az érték, annál jobb az eredmény (Wikipedia). The average ΔE result of 1.2 for the is very good and visual color differences between the real color and the displayed are very small. In comparison, the device class Tablet scored results ranging from 0.5 (minimum) to 29.43 (maximum). The category average of 4.93 ΔE is 75.7 % worse than the tested display. The maximum ΔE value of 3.2 of all tested colors is lower than it should be (average of 9.1 ΔE).
Grayscale
A szürkeárnyalatos értékeknek egyenletesen elosztottnak és színárnyalatmentesnek kell lenniük. A mért és a tervezett szürkeértékek közötti különbséget ismét a Delta E 2000 (ΔE) képlet segítségével mérjük. The average ΔE result of 1 for the is outstanding and differences between the real gray level and the displayed are only perceivable by trained experts. In comparison, the device class Tablet scored grayscale results ranging from 0.5 (minumum) to 98 (maximum). The category average of 5.2 ΔE is 80.8 % worse than the tested display.
Black Level
A fekete szint a kijelző fényerejét méri fekete szín megjelenítésekor. Ideális esetben a cd/m²-ben mért fényerő a lehető legalacsonyabb (a 0 cd/m² lenne az ideális, amit az OLED-kijelzők elérhetnek). The measured black level of 0.61 cd/m² is good. In comparison, the device class Tablet scored grayscale results ranging from 0.0001 (minimum) to 275 (maximum). The category average of 0.64 cd/m² is 4.69 % worse than the tested display.
min
Minimális fényerő
We measured the minimal brightness of a white area at very low 4.1 cd/m² and therefore well suited even for dark environments. In comparison, the device class Tablet scored grayscale results ranging from 0.01 (minimum) to 408.7 (maximum). The category average of 12.2 cd/m² is 66.4 % worse than the tested display.
Gamma
Az ideális Gamma-érték 2,2 Windows és OS X rendszerben. Minél nagyobb a távolság a 2,2-től, annál rosszabb a kép megjelenítése. We measured a gamma of 2.28 and therefore a distance of 0.08 to the ideal. In comparison, the device class Tablet scored grayscale results ranging from 0.27 (minimum) to 7154 (maximum). The category average of 7.6 cd/m² is 70 % worse.
Apple iPad 6 2018
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7"
Apple iPad (2017)
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7"
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5"
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7"
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8"
Screen
-10%
-13%
20%
-22%
-48%
Brightness middle
530
514
-3%
634
20%
650
23%
452
-15%
382
-28%
Brightness
513
485
-5%
625
22%
614
20%
468
-9%
378
-26%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
87
-5%
90
-2%
82
-11%
92
0%
Black Level *
0.61
0.46
25%
0.39
36%
0.42
31%
0.24
61%
Contrast
869
1117
29%
1626
87%
1548
78%
1592
83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.4
-17%
1.9
-58%
1
17%
1.8
-50%
2.8
-133%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.2
2.9
9%
3.9
-22%
1.9
41%
4
-25%
6
-88%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1
2.1
-110%
2.8
-180%
1.5
-50%
1.2
-20%
3.5
-250%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
2.11 104%
2.33 94%
CCT
6588 99%
6647 98%
7027 93%
6734 97%
6500 100%
6903 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.32
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.06

* ... a kisebb jobb

Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)

A képernyő tompításához egyes notebookok egyszerűen be- és kikapcsolják a háttérvilágítást gyors egymásutánban - ez az úgynevezett impulzusszélesség-moduláció (PWM) módszer. Ennek a ciklikus frekvenciának ideális esetben az emberi szem számára nem észlelhetőnek kell lennie. Ha ez a frekvencia túl alacsony, az érzékeny szemű felhasználóknak megerőltető lehet, fejfájást okozhat, vagy akár észre is vehetik a villódzást.
Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Megjelenítési válaszidők

A kijelző válaszideje azt mutatja, hogy a képernyő milyen gyorsan képes egyik színről a másikra váltani. A lassú válaszidők utóképekhez vezethetnek, és a mozgó tárgyak elmosódottak lehetnek (szellemképek). A gyors tempójú 3D-s címek játékosainak különösen oda kell figyelniük a gyors válaszidőkre.
       Válaszidő Fekete-fehér
25.9 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva↗ 14.4 ms emelkedés
↘ 11.5 ms ősz
A képernyő viszonylag lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és túl lassú lehet a játékosok számára.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (21 ms).
       Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között
26.4 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva↗ 17.7 ms emelkedés
↘ 18.7 ms ősz
A képernyő viszonylag lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és túl lassú lehet a játékosok számára.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3933 Points +12%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3924 Points +12%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
3527 Points +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
3499 Points
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (745 - 5713, n=15, az elmúlt 2 évben)
3270 Points -7%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (2672 - 3527, n=3)
3233 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1745 Points -50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1634 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
726 Points -79%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
9358 Points +57%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
9293 Points +56%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (1418 - 15310, n=15, az elmúlt 2 évben)
9145 Points +54%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
5952 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
5922 Points -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5809 Points -2%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (4508 - 5952, n=3)
5461 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4187 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3710 Points -38%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (444 - 9147, n=56, az elmúlt 2 évben)
3845 Points +22%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
3163 Points
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (2747 - 3163, n=4)
3002 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
2999 Points -5%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2441 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2409 Points -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1769 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1005 Points -68%
System
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (1103 - 14097, n=56, az elmúlt 2 évben)
6828 Points 0%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
6820 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
6097 Points -11%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (4874 - 6820, n=4)
6093 Points -11%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
4680 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3505 Points -49%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2838 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2337 Points -66%
Memory
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (916 - 10977, n=56, az elmúlt 2 évben)
4544 Points +241%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2654 Points +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1931 Points +45%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (1257 - 1463, n=4)
1343 Points +1%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1341 Points +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
1334 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1257 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1176 Points -12%
Graphics
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (580 - 31738, n=56, az elmúlt 2 évben)
7247 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
6896 Points +2%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
6760 Points
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (5111 - 6896, n=4)
6411 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4941 Points -27%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
4569 Points -32%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1602 Points -76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
530 Points -92%
Web
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
1628 Points
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (1531 - 1628, n=4)
1566 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1531 Points -6%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (10 - 1907, n=56, az elmúlt 2 évben)
1232 Points -24%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1213 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1007 Points -38%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
811 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
699 Points -57%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
54449 Points +46%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
54237 Points +45%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
37676 Points +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
37372 Points
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (24847 - 38138, n=5)
35156 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
30277 Points -19%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
29326 Points -22%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26875 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8481 Points -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
110971 Points +77%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
110148 Points +76%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
63974 Points +2%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
62626 Points
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (48421 - 65558, n=5)
60793 Points -3%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
44645 Points -29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35210 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34002 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
7720 Points -88%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21886 Points +41%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
19567 Points +26%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
19534 Points +26%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
15499 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
15450 Points 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14698 Points -5%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (9189 - 15626, n=5)
14249 Points -8%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
13324 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12947 Points -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4588 Points +25%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4521 Points +23%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
3672 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3438 Points -6%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (2964 - 3672, n=5)
3227 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
2964 Points -19%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (507 - 5864, n=19, az elmúlt 2 évben)
2660 Points -28%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2584 Points -30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1840 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
477 Points -87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
7434 Points +22%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
7212 Points +18%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
6095 Points
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (4057 - 6095, n=5)
4991 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4626 Points -24%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
4320 Points -29%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
4057 Points -33%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (454 - 6698, n=19, az elmúlt 2 évben)
2691 Points -56%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1719 Points -72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
399 Points -93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (863 - 4085, n=19, az elmúlt 2 évben)
2839 Points +85%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2445 Points +59%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
1960 Points +28%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
1960 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1811 Points +18%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
1535 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1525 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1522 Points -1%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (1251 - 1535, n=5)
1465 Points -5%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1074 Points -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3605 Points +32%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3558 Points +30%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
2735 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2578 Points -6%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (2367 - 2735, n=3)
2574 Points -6%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (361 - 14235, n=48, az elmúlt 2 évben)
2062 Points -25%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1957 Points -28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1642 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
296 Points -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4695 Points +28%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4537 Points +23%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
3682 Points
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (2949 - 3682, n=3)
3316 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2943 Points -20%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2519 Points -32%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (290 - 24605, n=48, az elmúlt 2 évben)
2180 Points -41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1504 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
239 Points -94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (858 - 5751, n=48, az elmúlt 2 évben)
2810 Points +95%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2419 Points +68%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
2027 Points +41%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
1988 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1798 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1721 Points +20%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (1399 - 1509, n=3)
1449 Points +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
1439 Points
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1098 Points -24%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (14 - 144, n=66, az elmúlt 2 évben)
62.5 fps +5%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
59.7 fps
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
59 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59 fps -1%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
59 fps -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
59 fps -1%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (57.7 - 59.7, n=6)
58.8 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
57.7 fps -3%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
56 fps -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps -68%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
225 fps +80%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
224 fps +79%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (15 - 873, n=66, az elmúlt 2 évben)
177.2 fps +42%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
125 fps
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
118 fps -6%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (92 - 125, n=6)
111.5 fps -11%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
110.3 fps -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
96 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
92 fps -26%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
80.8 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps -90%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
58.5 fps +43%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
58 fps +42%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (8.1 - 122, n=66, az elmúlt 2 évben)
50.7 fps +24%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (40.3 - 58.5, n=6)
49 fps +20%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
46 fps +12%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
40.9 fps
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
40.3 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps -17%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
28.7 fps -30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps -78%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
110 fps +76%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (7.3 - 530, n=66, az elmúlt 2 évben)
109.1 fps +74%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
109 fps +74%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
62.6 fps
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
58.9 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
60.7 fps -3%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (52 - 62.6, n=6)
58.9 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48 fps -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps -30%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
40.6 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5.1 fps -92%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
59.4 fps +118%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
43 fps +58%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (25 - 59.4, n=4)
38.3 fps +40%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (4.8 - 120, n=66, az elmúlt 2 évben)
38.2 fps +40%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
27.3 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
27 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps -30%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
18.5 fps -32%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6.7 fps -75%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (5 - 400, n=66, az elmúlt 2 évben)
76.7 fps +80%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
76 fps +78%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
63 fps +48%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
42.7 fps
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
42.2 fps -1%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (39.3 - 42.7, n=4)
41.4 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps -25%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
28.5 fps -33%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -93%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (3.1 - 117.9, n=65, az elmúlt 2 évben)
24.3 fps +36%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
17.9 fps
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (17.7 - 17.9, n=2)
17.8 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3.7 fps -79%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (2.2 - 284, n=65, az elmúlt 2 évben)
46 fps +72%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
26.8 fps
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (25.1 - 26.8, n=2)
26 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps -29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps -93%
Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38353 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38353 Points
High Quality
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21420 Points
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (309 - 9739, n=13, az elmúlt 2 évben)
2174 Points +28%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
1693 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1322 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1059 Points -37%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (1059 - 1693, n=5)
1321 Points -22%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1061 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 Points -64%
AnTuTu v7
MEM
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
12895 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
12783 Points -1%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (6141 - 12895, n=4)
9979 Points -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8364 Points -35%
UX
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
54510 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
51357 Points -6%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (32746 - 54510, n=4)
45782 Points -16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
28103 Points -48%
GPU
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (45772 - 68591, n=4)
54850 Points +12%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
49141 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
45772 Points -7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
33870 Points -31%
CPU
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (50770 - 89394, n=4)
65083 Points +20%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
54375 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
50770 Points -7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43350 Points -20%
Total Score
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (160578 - 210596, n=4)
175694 Points +3%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
170921 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
160682 Points -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113687 Points -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points +26%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
35209 Points +26%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
34163 Points +22%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
31188 Points +12%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
30333 Points +8%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (763 - 105178, n=85, az elmúlt 2 évben)
28151 Points +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 11.3)
27967 Points
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (19783 - 27967, n=5)
25316 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 10.0)
24875 Points -11%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
18148 Points -35%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD (Safari iOS 9)
9962 Points -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Samsung Browser 5.2)
9531 Points -66%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 65)
6802 Points -76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4768 Points -83%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
4682 Points -83%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
362 Points +81%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
359 Points +80%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points +77%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
257 Points +29%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
244 Points +22%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
205 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 10.0)
202 Points +1%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (200 - 204, n=3)
202 Points +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 11.3)
200 Points
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD (Safari iOS 9)
144 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Samsung Browser 5.2)
132 Points -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 65)
116 Points -42%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
74 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
67 Points -66%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points +34%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
223.5 Points +34%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
206.7 Points +24%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
202.1 Points +21%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
200.6 Points +20%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (165.9 - 172.6, n=4)
168.5 Points +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 11.3)
167.2 Points
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 10.0)
165.9 Points -1%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
128.6 Points -23%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (az elmúlt 2 évben)
90.4 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Samsung Browser 5.2)
42.73 Points -74%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 65)
36.13 Points -78%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
28.27 Points -83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
26.1 Points -84%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
9903 ms * -865%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6786 ms * -561%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * -480%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
  (319 - 34733, n=73, az elmúlt 2 évben)
3845 ms * -275%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD (Safari iOS 9)
2557 ms * -149%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2244 ms * -119%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1458 ms * -42%
Átlagos Apple A10 Fusion
  (1026 - 1531, n=5)
1178 ms * -15%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 10.0)
1113 ms * -8%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 11.3)
1026 ms *
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
973 ms * +5%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
969 ms * +6%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
731 ms * +29%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
720 ms * +30%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * +30%

* ... a kisebb jobb

Max. terhelés
 34 °C32 °C30 °C 
 34 °C33 °C32 °C 
 36 °C38 °C35 °C 
Maximum: 38 °C
Átlag: 33.8 °C
33 °C33 °C34 °C
33 °C36 °C35 °C
35 °C39 °C37 °C
Maximum: 39 °C
Átlag: 35 °C
Tápegység (max.)  50 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini, TMD-50
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.7342530.830.33131.132.5403435.85032.432.16329.2308033.931.110028.338.312526.351.816026.148.620024.351.925022.955.1315225540022.363.350020.962.46302060.580019.363.2100018.959.9125018.562.3160017.962.2200017.862.8250017.669.3315017.864.7400017.761.7500017.659.3630017.666.2800017.861.31000017.856.71250017.759.21600017.862.1SPL30.875.7N1.537.2median 18.5median 61.3Delta2.33.931.641.125.436.925.335.832.934.533.630.731.632.128.429.92742.520.850.12253.221.357.520.863.921.265.219.465.819.567.217.769.117.967.317.872.617.375.717.477.916.777.717.274.418.275.117.970.717.667.917.763.917.855.917.956.418.158.818.260.93084.61.359.1median 17.9median 65.81.47.531.636.225.430.625.33132.931.533.634.231.634.628.437.42750.120.858.32261.321.367.520.868.521.267.819.465.519.565.217.767.317.967.517.865.217.372.617.467.516.768.117.268.718.272.517.970.617.66717.76117.858.217.96018.167.618.267.53081.21.351.3median 17.9median 67.51.42.527.428.327.429.428.329.429.931.129.939.329.439.327.427.227.42625.72626.724.726.735.324.835.344.828.544.850.221.850.253.22253.252.222.452.256.422.756.460.323.360.365.924.465.966.219.666.265.51865.565.617.665.666.118.466.171.216.771.275.716.375.777.915.677.976.615.876.676.515.376.574.315.374.375.815.375.871.515.171.569.915.269.97515.27577.715.177.786.129.886.162.31.362.3median 66.2median 17.6median 66.29.63.79.639.432.336.737.632.439.433.729.835.128.731.333.730.631.425.928.431.730.631.829.739.639.12631.840.437.636.43739.440.433.335.529.331.536.233.328.436.131.129.228.628.428.826.833.430.225.428.831.125.63625.721.331.14133.546.841.623.3415447.857.148.822.55457.647.263.655.622.457.663.956.473.260.921.363.969.859.274.862.118.469.868.756.176.862.917.568.77058.379.665.817.57069.95478.462.517.269.965.248.576.358.216.865.266.949.175.956.917.366.977.456.978.76217.477.477.359.580.261.916.677.373.154.7806217.373.17555.780.862.717.67574.955.380.76317.674.97858.28263.617.77873.955.180.663.117.473.967.348.777.860.317.767.357.239.271.453.817.957.250.831.561.943.218.150.840.623.75233.918.140.68667.791.27429.88664.522.994.234.91.364.5median 67.3median 54median 76.8median 60.9median 17.7median 67.310.18.89.17.71.710.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad 6 2018Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017Apple iPad (2017)Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Frekvenciadiagram (a jelölőnégyzetek be- és kipipálhatók az eszközök összehasonlításához)
Apple iPad 6 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad (2017) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 2.2 / 7.8 / 7.9 Watt
Terhelés midlight 12.6 / 12.8 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad 6 2018
 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
10875 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 4
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
6660 mAh
Az osztály átlaga Tablet
 
Power Consumption
26%
10%
9%
61%
63%
70%
52%
40%
23%
61%
74%
41%
27%
Idle Minimum *
2.2
1.44
35%
1.55
30%
2.06
6%
0.72
67%
1.03
53%
0.54
75%
0.8
64%
2.08
5%
2.01
9%
0.89
60%
0.54
75%
1.6
27%
Idle Average *
7.8
6.12
22%
8.58
-10%
7.42
5%
2.45
69%
2.4
69%
1.63
79%
3.6
54%
3.5
55%
5.4
31%
3.13
60%
1.51
81%
4.13
47%
Idle Maximum *
7.9
6.14
22%
8.59
-9%
7.47
5%
2.52
68%
2.6
67%
1.67
79%
3.9
51%
3.58
55%
5.44
31%
3.36
57%
1.54
81%
4.22
47%
Load Average *
12.6
8.55
32%
10.09
20%
9.45
25%
3.84
70%
2.96
77%
2.74
78%
6.1
52%
6.97
45%
8.55
32%
3.93
69%
3.75
70%
6.57
48%
Load Maximum *
12.8
10.62
17%
10.61
17%
12.31
4%
9.02
30%
6.6
48%
7.78
39%
8
37%
7.4
42%
11.53
10%
5.45
57%
5.01
61%
8.32
35%

* ... a kisebb jobb

Akkumulátor üzemidő
WiFi Websurfing
11h 54min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 05min
Apple iPad 6 2018
 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
10875 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
6660 mAh
Akkumulátor üzemidő
15%
3%
21%
55%
70%
21%
WiFi v1.3
714
764
7%
693
-3%
736
3%
760
6%
895
25%
698
-2%
Load
185
225
22%
199
8%
257
39%
375
103%
396
114%
266
44%
Reader / Idle
1496
2036
2919
1903
1357
988
H.264
845
629
676
551
493
602

Pro

+ Pencil támogatás
+ alacsonyabb ár diákok és iskolák számára
+ kitűnő kivitelezés és anyaghasználat
+ jó kijelző

Kontra

- nem laminált kijelző, jelentős méretű réssel az üvegnél (de legalább könnyebb javítani)
- évek óta nem fejlesztett kamera
- nem friss lapkakészlet
In review: Apple iPad 2018
In review: Apple iPad 2018

A 2018-as iPad (6. generáció) pont az a kis ráncfelvarrás, amit a specifikációk ígérnek. A gyorsabb, de így is koros lapkakészlet, valamint az Apple Pencil támogatás a két legfontosabb újdonsága. Az üzemidő és a fogyasztás is megszenvedte ugyan ezt a frissítést, de még így is elég jók.

A hőkibocsátás nem aggasztó, a kijelző még mindig nagyon jó. Az előlap üvege és a kijelzőpanel közötti rés nem tökéletes, de cserébe a készülék javítása egyszerűbb, ha betörik a képernyő. Az viszont kérdéses, hogy az iPad képes-e versenyre kelni a Chromebook-okkal az iskolákban. Ára a Pencil-lel, és egy billentyűzettel sokkal magasabb. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a szoftvernek van esélye megmenteni a helyzetet, és ebben az Apple hagyományosan jó.

Megfizethető lett az új iPad? Olyan 80 dollárral olcsóbb, mint kistestvére, az iPad Mini, és a Pro modellek pedig $649 körül kezdődnek az Apple online boltjában. Jó Android-os tabletek, hasonló minőségű kijelzőkkel pedig már $350 alatt is kaphatók.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Apple iPad 6 2018 - 09/16/2019 v7 (old)
Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner

Váz
84 / 98 → 86%
Billentyűzet
74 / 80 → 92%
Érintőpad
93%
Csatlakoztathatóság
37 / 70 → 52%
Súly
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Akkumulátor
89%
Kijelző
89%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
34 / 78 → 44%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
58 / 92 → 63%
Hőmérséklet
88%
Zaj
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 83%
Camera
47 / 85 → 56%
Átlag
73%
85%
Tablet - Súlyozott átlag

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Apple iPad 6 2018 Tablet rövid értékelés
Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner, 2018-04- 3 (Update: 2018-04- 3)