Asus VivoBook Pro 15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050) Laptop rövid értékelés
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fényerő megoszlás: 85 %
Centrumban: 246 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 515:1 (Fekete: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.25 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.27% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T INNOLUX N156HGA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD CMN15E8 (N156HCE-EN1), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Sabre 15G ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV AU Optronics AUO41ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S BOE CQ NV156HFM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 59% | -2% | -5% | 1% | 70% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.92 | 65.7 65% | 38.97 -2% | 38.03 -5% | 40.56 2% | 68.9 73% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.8 | 90.3 51% | 58.2 -3% | 56.5 -6% | 59.4 -1% | 98.9 65% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.27 | 65.9 60% | 40.3 -2% | 39.29 -5% | 41.9 2% | 70.9 72% |
| Response Times | -31% | -30% | -55% | -62% | -163% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 38.8 ? 12% | 32 ? 27% | 44.4 ? -1% | 46 ? -5% | 54 ? -23% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 13 ? | 27.2 ? -109% | 25.6 ? -97% | 27.2 ? -109% | 34 ? -162% | 52.4 ? -303% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 25910 ? 4% | 20000 ? -20% | 20000 ? -20% | ||
| Screen | 36% | -18% | -16% | 23% | 46% | |
| Brightness middle | 247 | 335 36% | 248.4 1% | 209.7 -15% | 277 12% | 400 62% |
| Brightness | 224 | 313 40% | 241 8% | 193 -14% | 268 20% | 392 75% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 83 -2% | 84 -1% | 75 -12% | 91 7% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.27 44% | 0.3 37% | 0.19 60% | 0.26 46% | 0.26 46% |
| Contrast | 515 | 1241 141% | 828 61% | 1104 114% | 1065 107% | 1538 199% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.39 | 4.7 13% | 7.5 -39% | 7.8 -45% | 5.05 6% | 4.9 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.98 | 8.1 -2% | 25.2 -216% | 24.1 -202% | 8.93 -12% | 11 -38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.25 | 5.8 -10% | 6.5 -24% | 7.3 -39% | 2.97 43% | 7.2 -37% |
| Gamma | 2.48 89% | 2.06 107% | 2.19 100% | 2.39 92% | 2.39 92% | 2.11 104% |
| CCT | 7609 85% | 6518 100% | 7852 83% | 5771 113% | 6466 101% | 6911 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 58.7 54% | 37 -3% | 39.3 3% | 38 0% | 64.2 69% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60 | 90.1 50% | 57.9 -3% | 56.5 -6% | 59 -2% | 98.9 65% |
| Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | 21% /
28% | -17% /
-17% | -25% /
-19% | -13% /
3% | -16% /
23% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Megjelenítési válaszidők
| ↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 10 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 3 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő jó reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, de túl lassú lehet a versenyképes játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
| 44 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 25 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 19 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és nem lesz kielégítő a játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (32.9 ms). | ||
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
| Képernyő villogása / PWM észlelve | 25000 Hz | ≤ 30 % fényerő beállítása |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3833 pontok | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4934 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP | Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Hynix HFS128G39TND | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 142% | 9% | -3% | -80% | |
| Read Seq | 483.9 | 1434 196% | 522 8% | 510 5% | 123 -75% |
| Write Seq | 408.3 | 1365 234% | 476.6 17% | 137.6 -66% | 74.2 -82% |
| Read 512 | 319 | 614 92% | 399.7 25% | 362.1 14% | 101.7 -68% |
| Write 512 | 346.7 | 688 98% | 185.4 -47% | 137.2 -60% | 42.51 -88% |
| Read 4k | 24.77 | 60.6 145% | 33.12 34% | 35.18 42% | 10.84 -56% |
| Write 4k | 79.4 | 158 99% | 89.8 13% | 104.8 32% | 1.021 -99% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 246.1 | 617 151% | 400.9 63% | 375.8 53% | 69.8 -72% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 241.5 | 525 117% | 140.2 -42% | 138.1 -43% | 1.057 -100% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7558 pontok | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20059 pontok | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5452 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing (érték szerinti rendezés) | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing (érték szerinti rendezés) | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (érték szerinti rendezés) | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 111.4 | 69.8 | 31.02 | 20 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 124.2 | 69.3 | 39.12 | 31.59 |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128 | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP | Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | -7% | -5% | 7% | -6% | |
| off / környezet * | 30.5 | 29.4 4% | 28.2 8% | 29.3 4% | 30 2% | 30.3 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.6 | 29.4 4% | 33 -8% | 32.3 -6% | 30 2% | 31.6 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 30.9 | 29.9 3% | 33.3 -8% | 32.3 -5% | 30 3% | 31.6 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.9 | 29.9 6% | 34.7 -9% | 32.4 -2% | 31.1 3% | 33.4 -5% |
| Load Average * | 38.6 | 38.3 1% | 44.5 -15% | 44.4 -15% | 31.3 19% | 47.8 -24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.3 | 39.8 16% | 49.2 -4% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 45.7 | 39.6 13% | 52.8 -16% | 49.2 -8% | 38.9 15% | 47.8 -5% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Zajszint
| Üresjárat |
| 30.6 / 30.9 / 31.9 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 30.9 dB(A) |
| Terhelés |
| 38.6 / 45.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról) környezeti zaj: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.8 °C / 94.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6 °C / -10.8 F).
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128 | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP | Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | -8% | 6% | -16% | -14% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.8 | 43.6 -4% | 43.6 -4% | 41.8 -0% | 47.2 -13% | 47.6 -14% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 36.8 | 44.5 -21% | 40.2 -9% | 33.4 9% | 42.2 -15% | 42.1 -14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.2 | 28 -7% | 27.8 -6% | 24.4 7% | 31.8 -21% | 29.9 -14% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.9 | 26.7 -3% | 29.2 -13% | 23.8 8% | 29.5 -14% | 29.8 -15% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
| Üresjárat | 4.7 / 7.7 / 10.9 Watt |
| Terhelés |
82 / 120 Watt |
   
| |
Kulcs:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -14% | -19% | -27% | -12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 5.05 -7% | 8 -70% | 8.29 -76% | 8.4 -79% | 6.6 -40% |
| Idle Average * | 7.7 | 8.2 -6% | 10.9 -42% | 8.9 -16% | 13.1 -70% | 9 -17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.9 | 12.2 -12% | 11 -1% | 10.2 6% | 14.2 -30% | 10.7 2% |
| Load Average * | 82 | 82 -0% | 76.7 6% | 77.1 6% | 50 39% | 77.5 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 109 | 93.1 15% | 94.9 13% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 120 | 120 -0% | 106.4 11% | 136.6 -14% | 111 7% | 130 -8% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 73 Wh | Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 63.3 Wh | Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akkumulátor üzemidő | 32% | -19% | 32% | -16% | -7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 609 | 1061 74% | 493 -19% | 961 58% | 565 -7% | |
| H.264 | 352 | 465 32% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 392 | 535 36% | 261 -33% | 389 -1% | 330 -16% | 334 -15% |
| Load | 82 | 70 -15% | 77 -6% | 115 40% | 84 2% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 68 |
Pro
Kontra
Az Asus VivoBook Pro 15 elegáns designjával, alapjáratok takarékos működésével, kényelmes tömegével, jó hangszóróival és mérsékelt melegedésével próbál lekenyerezni minket.
Ennek ellenére nem tudnánk jó szívvel ajánlani a VivoBook-ot, mivel akadozások, telepről működve brutális lefojtás és véletlenszerűen pulzáló ventilátorok jellemzik. Ezeket azonban egy szoftveres frissítéssel a gyártó valószínűleg orvosolja majd. Ugyanakkor a kijelző minősége elmarad a riválisokétól, és a port választék is szűkös, mégis az egyik legdrágább gép a kategóriájában.
Jelenleg a negatívumok uralkodnak a gépről kialakult képben. Ez nem a hardver, inkább a firmware hibájának tűnik. Az Asusnak hamar orvosolnia kellene ezt, és akkor a VivoBook jó laptop lehet. Az ára ehhez képest magasnak tűnik, vannak nála megfizethetőbb versenytársak is.
Az Asus VivoBook Pro 15 még mindig küzd egy sor buggal (lassulás/akadozások), akkuról üzemeltetve a teljesítménye durván visszaesik, és a ventilátorvezérlés is gyatrán teljesít. Emellé egy elég rossz TN panelt kapunk, és ez így együtt védhetetlenné teszi a jelenlegi árát.
Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.
Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T
- 10/09/2017 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze
Price comparison
