Asus ZenBook 14 UX425E rövid értékelés: 11. generációs Core i7 „Tiger Lake” Debütálás
Értékelés | Dátum | Model | Súly | Magasság | Méret | Felbontás | Legjobb ár |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.2 % v7 (old) | 12/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
82.4 % v7 (old) | 12/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
85.3 % v7 (old) | 12/2020 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 |
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
|
Fényerő megoszlás: 91 %
Centrumban: 375.1 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1103:1 (Fekete: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.79
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T AU AUO323D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14T90N LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.4", 1920x1200 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -6% | -12% | -4% | 3% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.6 | 64 -7% | 60.1 -12% | 65 -5% | 71.7 5% | 66.3 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.3 | 92 -6% | 85.5 -13% | 95.7 -3% | 99.3 1% | 97.3 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.8 | 65.3 -6% | 61.1 -12% | 66.7 -4% | 72.9 4% | 68.5 -2% |
Response Times | 8% | 11% | -17% | -2% | -14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.6 ? | 37.6 ? 24% | 36 ? 27% | 54 ? -9% | 45.6 ? 8% | 50 ? -1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 28.8 ? -9% | 28 ? -6% | 32.8 ? -24% | 29.6 ? -12% | 33.2 ? -26% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | |||||
Screen | -58% | -40% | -24% | -26% | -19% | |
Brightness middle | 375.1 | 355.8 -5% | 280 -25% | 322.2 -14% | 399.6 7% | 607.6 62% |
Brightness | 371 | 341 -8% | 286 -23% | 301 -19% | 385 4% | 595 60% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 88 -3% | 78 -14% | 86 -5% | 89 -2% | 96 5% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.38 -12% | 0.208 39% | 0.25 26% | 0.37 -9% | 0.4 -18% |
Contrast | 1103 | 936 -15% | 1346 22% | 1289 17% | 1080 -2% | 1519 38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.79 | 4.47 -150% | 3.97 -122% | 3.62 -102% | 3.2 -79% | 3.23 -80% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.05 | 9.12 -199% | 8.29 -172% | 6.9 -126% | 6.44 -111% | 8.67 -184% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.79 | 2.89 -61% | 3.42 -91% | 1.22 32% | 1.73 3% | 1.01 44% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 6.2 -170% | 2.83 -23% | 3.9 -70% | 4.7 -104% | 5.5 -139% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.34 94% | 2.43 91% | 2.21 100% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 6405 101% | 8072 81% | 6556 99% | 6344 102% | 7184 90% | 6413 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.9 | 59.3 -7% | 56 -12% | 61.3 -4% | 66.3 4% | 63 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.8 | 91.6 -7% | 85 -14% | 95.6 -3% | 99.5 1% | 97.5 -1% |
Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | -19% /
-40% | -14% /
-28% | -15% /
-20% | -8% /
-18% | -12% /
-15% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Megjelenítési válaszidők
↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
---|---|---|
26.4 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 13.2 ms emelkedés | |
↘ 13.2 ms ősz | ||
A képernyő viszonylag lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és túl lassú lehet a játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
49.6 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 27.6 ms emelkedés | |
↘ 22 ms ősz | ||
A képernyő lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és nem lesz kielégítő a játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (32.8 ms). |
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Átlagos Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Átlagos Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Átlagos Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA |
* ... a kisebb jobb
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4278 pontok | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3087 pontok | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4704 pontok | |
Segítség |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | LG Gram 17 17Z90N-V.AA77G Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 46% | 21% | 3% | 40% | |
Seq Read | 1219 | 2722 123% | 2071 70% | 1237 1% | 2213 82% |
Seq Write | 947 | 2649 180% | 1462 54% | 1069 13% | 1401 48% |
4K Read | 50.9 | 52.2 3% | 49.82 -2% | 52.1 2% | 55.2 8% |
4K Write | 150.9 | 132.4 -12% | 140.7 -7% | 134.7 -11% | 130.3 -14% |
4K-64 Read | 587 | 886 51% | 869 48% | 585 0% | 878 50% |
4K-64 Write | 862 | 1074 25% | 729 -15% | 854 -1% | 1478 71% |
Access Time Read * | 0.083 | 0.041 51% | 0.069 17% | 0.05 40% | 0.036 57% |
Access Time Write * | 0.114 | 0.03 74% | 0.028 75% | 0.117 -3% | 0.086 25% |
Score Read | 760 | 1211 59% | 1126 48% | 761 0% | 1154 52% |
Score Write | 1108 | 1471 33% | 1016 -8% | 1095 -1% | 1748 58% |
Score Total | 2260 | 3309 46% | 2700 19% | 2255 0% | 3467 53% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1518 | 2096 38% | 1574 4% | 1714 13% | 2161 42% |
Copy Program MB/s | 549 | 395.6 -28% | 553 1% | 511 -7% | 572 4% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1164 | 1096 -6% | 993 -15% | 1187 2% | 1433 23% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 36% | 13% | 5% | 32% | |
Write 4K | 132.3 | 162.8 23% | 168.4 27% | 140.7 6% | 128.6 -3% |
Read 4K | 51.7 | 51 -1% | 55 6% | 55.6 8% | 45.25 -12% |
Write Seq | 1264 | 2078 64% | 1415 12% | 1949 54% | |
Read Seq | 1484 | 1991 34% | 1516 2% | 2359 59% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 478.4 | 440.1 -8% | 476.1 0% | 474.5 -1% | 445 -7% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 366.9 | 450.1 23% | 506 38% | 403.4 10% | 404.5 10% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1750 | 2998 71% | 1492 -15% | 1796 3% | 3019 73% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1970 | 3562 81% | 2357 20% | 1913 -3% | 3564 81% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 930 | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 963 | ||||
Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | 41% /
42% | 17% /
18% | 4% /
4% | 36% /
37% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 20836 pontok | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 20704 pontok | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6547 pontok | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 83826 pontok | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16127 pontok | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4471 pontok | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1541 pontok | |
Segítség |
alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 81.7 | 66.6 | 18.7 | 7.95 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 74.4 | 41 | 25.4 | 11.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 76.9 | 67.4 | 46.4 | 42.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 35.4 | 20.8 | 15.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 50.1 | 35.4 | 32.6 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 77.5 | 35.2 | 28.3 | 23.1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 41 | 18 | 15 | |
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 25 | 19 | 16 | |
Apex Legends (2019) | 70.6 | 30.8 | 24.8 | 22.3 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 38 | 23 | 20 | 19 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 28.2 | 15 | 11.6 | 9.5 |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 113.6 | 43.8 | 29.9 | 20.1 |
The Division 2 (2019) | 30 | 17 | 12 | 8 |
Anno 1800 (2019) | 50.8 | 19.9 | 12.1 | 7.1 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 76.2 | 26.2 | 16.2 | 11 |
Control (2019) | 42.9 | 14.1 | 9.8 | |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 39.3 | 19.7 | 13 | 9.7 |
GRID 2019 (2019) | 67.5 | 36.9 | 26.9 | 25.8 |
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 11.8 | 10.2 | 10.3 | |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 38 | |||
Doom Eternal (2020) | 42.1 | 21.4 | 19.9 | 18.6 |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 97 | 39.3 | 21.2 | 16.2 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 70 | 40 | 29 | 18 |
Death Stranding (2020) | 37 | 22.6 | 21.8 | 21.3 |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE Vega 8, R7 4800U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 7% | 3% | 11% | 5% | |
off / környezet * | 29.8 | 26.2 12% | 30.1 -1% | 29 3% | 26.3 12% | 28.3 5% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.9 | 26.2 12% | 30.1 -1% | 30 -0% | 26.5 11% | 28.3 5% |
Idle Average * | 31 | 27.2 12% | 30.1 3% | 30 3% | 26.5 15% | 28.3 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 27.2 12% | 30.1 3% | 30 3% | 26.5 15% | 28.3 9% |
Load Average * | 35.6 | 41.5 -17% | 30.1 15% | 35.2 1% | 31.8 11% | 32.5 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.4 | 39.7 -6% | 35.9 4% | 39.3 -5% | ||
Load Maximum * | 40.8 | 41.1 -1% | 32.02 22% | 37 9% | 35.9 12% | 39.3 4% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Zajszint
Üresjárat |
| 29.9 / 31 / 31 dB(A) |
Terhelés |
| 35.6 / 40.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm távolságról) környezeti zaj: 29.8 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.4 °C / -15.2 F).
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 0.38 / 0.76 Watt |
Üresjárat | 4.8 / 6.5 / 7.7 Watt |
Terhelés |
29.6 / 57.8 Watt |
Kulcs:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | -8% | 15% | -19% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 2.9 40% | 3.6 25% | 2.9 40% | 4 17% | 4.2 12% |
Idle Average * | 6.5 | 6.2 5% | 7.5 -15% | 5.8 11% | 6.3 3% | 6.9 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 7 9% | 9.4 -22% | 6.2 19% | 7.7 -0% | 7.5 3% |
Load Average * | 29.6 | 47.1 -59% | 42 -42% | 32.9 -11% | 48.3 -63% | 33.3 -13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.6 | 34.7 -21% | 49 -71% | 37.1 -30% | ||
Load Maximum * | 57.8 | 62.8 -9% | 51 12% | 48.5 16% | 57.6 -0% | 48.4 16% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8, 61 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 52 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akkumulátor üzemidő | -31% | -41% | 1% | -25% | -3% | |
Reader / Idle | 1554 | 966 -38% | 1966 27% | 1623 4% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 786 | 440 -44% | 461 -41% | 751 -4% | 619 -21% | 763 -3% |
Load | 194 | 171 -12% | 153 -21% | 79 -59% |
Pro
Kontra
A ZenBook 14 UX425EA legerősebb előnye a nagy teljesítmény/súly. Olyan könnyű, mint egy LG Gram 14, de jelentősen nagyobb teljesítménnyel és világosabb képernyővel. A 2018-as Razer Blade Stealth-et úgy harangoztuk be, mint amelynek a méretéhez viszonyítva megkapó a teljesítménye, viszont az UX425EA legalább olyan gyorsan képes futtatni a játékokat, vagy valamivel még gyorsabban, és eközben kisebb a súlya, és kevesebbet is fogyaszt.
Az alacsony súlynak ára van, ami a ház merevségében nyilvánul meg, mivel az alternatívák, mint a Dell XPS, HP Spectre, Blade Stealth, Huawei MateBook X Pro, vagy Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 mind erősebbek és jobb kivitelezésűek. A nyers CPU teljesítmény egyáltalán nem gyorsabb, mint sok létező Ice Lake Core i7 opció, a GPU teljesítménye pedig ingadozó marad számos nagy igényű játék esetében.
Az Intel-nek sikerült egy olyan 11. generációs Core i7 U sorozatú CPU-t megalkotni, amely jobb, mint a 10. generációs elődje. De hogy pontosan mennyivel jobb, az a munkaterheléstől függ.
Aki alkalmanként útközben Rocket League-et vagy DOTA 2-t játszik, annak ez a szuperkönnyű, Tiger Lake-meghajtású ultrabook alkalmasnak bizonyulhat. Máskülönben a böngészés, emailezés, üzemidő és videó streaming élménye lényegében megegyezik bármilyen régebbi 10. generációs Ice Lake laptopéval, ami kapható.
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
- 09/29/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo