Asus Zephyrus G15 laptop rövid értékelés: Szembetűnő
Possible contenders in comparison
Értékelés | Dátum | Model | Súly | Magasság | Méret | Felbontás | Legjobb ár |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.8 % v7 (old) | 07/2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
v (old) | 06/2020 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 06/2021 | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
|
Fényerő megoszlás: 89 %
Centrumban: 327 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 991:1 (Fekete: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.27
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.173
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q CMN N156KME-GNA (CMN152A), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | MSI GS66 10SGS AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE AUO048E, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -16% | -15% | -15% | -15% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.3 | 69.9 -28% | 70.2 -28% | 70.3 -28% | 70.3 -28% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.1 -1% | 99 -1% | 99.5 0% | 99.4 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.2 | 71.1 -18% | 71.4 -17% | 72.2 -16% | 71.3 -17% |
Response Times | -8% | 26% | -29% | 19% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8.8 ? | 11.2 ? -27% | 6 ? 32% | 14.4 ? -64% | 8 ? 9% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 10 ? 11% | 9 ? 20% | 10.4 ? 7% | 8 ? 29% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 24% | 18% | 6% | 30% | |
Brightness middle | 327 | 339.4 4% | 347 6% | 320 -2% | 470 44% |
Brightness | 309 | 331 7% | 328 6% | 318 3% | 468 51% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 92 3% | 89 0% | 88 -1% | 85 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.24 27% | 0.285 14% | 0.24 27% | 0.21 36% |
Contrast | 991 | 1414 43% | 1218 23% | 1333 35% | 2238 126% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.49 | 1.58 65% | 2.35 48% | 4.03 10% | 3.28 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.42 | 3.8 55% | 4.15 51% | 8.43 -0% | 7.31 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.27 | 1.47 35% | 1.16 49% | 0.98 57% | 0.8 65% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 2.3 45% | 3.04 28% | 5.94 -41% | 4.49 -7% |
Gamma | 2.173 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.35 94% | 2.42 91% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 7014 93% | 6952 93% | 6658 98% | 6751 96% | 7438 87% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 86 | 64.8 -25% | 65 -24% | 66 -23% | 65 -24% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 99.4 0% | 99 0% | 99 0% | 99 0% |
Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | 0% /
12% | 10% /
13% | -13% /
-2% | 11% /
20% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Megjelenítési válaszidők
↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
---|---|---|
11.2 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 6.8 ms emelkedés | |
↘ 4.4 ms ősz | ||
A képernyő jó reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, de túl lassú lehet a versenyképes játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (21 ms). | ||
↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
8.8 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 4.4 ms emelkedés | |
↘ 4.4 ms ősz | ||
A képernyő gyors reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és játékra is alkalmasnak kell lennie. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (32.9 ms). |
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
* ... a kisebb jobb
PCMark 10 Score | 6896 pontok | |
Segítség |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | MSI GS66 10SGS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -16% | -6% | -5% | -6% | |
Write 4K | 156.4 | 132.5 -15% | 135.7 -13% | 131.7 -16% | 110.4 -29% |
Read 4K | 66.7 | 45.03 -32% | 46.98 -30% | 47.34 -29% | 55.1 -17% |
Write Seq | 2318 | 1987 -14% | 2180 -6% | 2884 24% | |
Read Seq | 2151 | 1434 -33% | 1949 -9% | 2303 7% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 525 | 467.5 -11% | 510 -3% | 423.9 -19% | 466.6 -11% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 452.1 | 536 19% | 569 26% | 487.7 8% | 517 14% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3055 | 2003 -34% | 2984 -2% | 2822 -8% | 3424 12% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3607 | 3306 -8% | 3238 -10% | 3478 -4% | 3519 -2% |
AS SSD | -31% | -6% | -5% | -4% | |
Seq Read | 2950 | 1086 -63% | 1950 -34% | 2767 -6% | 3088 5% |
Seq Write | 1600 | 1901 19% | 2322 45% | 2613 63% | 2561 60% |
4K Read | 53.6 | 51 -5% | 45.48 -15% | 47.55 -11% | 43.01 -20% |
4K Write | 126.8 | 117.3 -7% | 95.4 -25% | 98.9 -22% | 102 -20% |
4K-64 Read | 1429 | 1503 5% | 1484 4% | 1205 -16% | 1549 8% |
4K-64 Write | 2177 | 1721 -21% | 1887 -13% | 2007 -8% | 1378 -37% |
Access Time Read * | 0.064 | 0.059 8% | 0.051 20% | 0.065 -2% | 0.051 20% |
Access Time Write * | 0.029 | 0.1 -245% | 0.038 -31% | 0.038 -31% | 0.037 -28% |
Score Read | 1778 | 1662 -7% | 1725 -3% | 1529 -14% | 1901 7% |
Score Write | 2464 | 2029 -18% | 2215 -10% | 2367 -4% | 1737 -30% |
Score Total | 5090 | 4588 -10% | 4843 -5% | 4677 -8% | 4583 -10% |
Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | -24% /
-25% | -6% /
-6% | -5% /
-5% | -5% /
-5% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 42022 pontok | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 20784 pontok | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9391 pontok | |
Segítség |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Az osztály átlaga Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=169, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Az osztály átlaga Gaming (50.6 - 167.6, n=43, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 |
alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 177 | 152 | 90 | |||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 155 | 90.2 | 62.2 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 148 | 140 | 126 | 119 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 103 | 88 | 72.4 | |||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 111 | 106 | 79 | 43 | ||
Battlefield V (2018) | 131 | 125 | 98.3 | 59.2 | ||
Apex Legends (2019) | 144 | 144 | 120 | 69.2 | ||
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 101 | 90 | 78 | 50 | ||
Metro Exodus (2019) | 85 | 68.7 | 53.8 | 35.4 | ||
The Division 2 (2019) | 105 | 82 | 56 | 31 | ||
Anno 1800 (2019) | 77.6 | 44.3 | 37.9 | 25.2 | ||
Rage 2 (2019) | 116 | 115 | 75.5 | 37.8 | ||
Control (2019) | 82.3 | 55.7 | 29 | |||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 94.5 | 76.5 | 55.7 | 32.3 | ||
GRID 2019 (2019) | 113 | 84.8 | 69.8 | 48.7 | ||
Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 94.3 | 89.4 | 67.9 | 40.7 | ||
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 97.8 | 91.5 | 79 | 42.1 | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 85.1 | 57.5 | 46.9 | 31.2 | ||
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 111 | 71.4 | 36.8 | |||
Doom Eternal (2020) | 165 | 163 | 123 | 68 | ||
Gears Tactics (2020) | 136 | 107 | 72.4 | 39.4 | ||
F1 2020 (2020) | 162 | 131 | 103 | 60 | ||
Death Stranding (2020) | 83.6 | 82.3 | 73.7 | 52.1 | ||
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 93 | 84 | 67 | 41 | ||
Crysis Remastered (2020) | 79.2 | 56.9 | 45.2 | 29.4 | ||
Serious Sam 4 (2020) | 93.3 | 80.2 | 67.2 | |||
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 98.7 | 70.7 | 37.2 | |||
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) | 198 | 189 | 134 | 79.4 | ||
FIFA 21 (2020) | 198 | 190 | 156 | 104 | ||
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 82 | 65 | 52 | 31 | ||
Dirt 5 (2020) | 85.6 | 56.4 | 42.7 | 39.6 | ||
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 74 | 64 | 52 | 33 | ||
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020) | 89.4 | 81.7 | 62.8 | 36.9 | ||
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) | 112 | 101 | 67.1 | 35.8 | ||
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) | 88 | 82 | 64 | 44 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) | 70 | 60.2 | 39.8 | 19.7 |
Zajszint
Üresjárat |
| 26 / 27 / 31 dB(A) |
Terhelés |
| 49 / 51 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm távolságról) környezeti zaj: 25 dB(A) |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | -4% | -10% | 5% | |
off / környezet * | 25 | 28.5 -14% | 30.1 -20% | 30 -20% | 24.4 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 26 | 30 -15% | 30.1 -16% | 30 -15% | 24.4 6% |
Idle Average * | 27 | 30 -11% | 30.1 -11% | 33 -22% | 24.4 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 30.9 -0% | 30.1 3% | 36 -16% | 24.4 21% |
Load Average * | 49 | 39.5 19% | 46.8 4% | 50 -2% | 49.3 -1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 48 2% | 48.4 1% | 48 2% | 54 -10% |
Load Maximum * | 51 | 59.4 -16% | 46 10% | 50 2% | 46.6 9% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 5% | 3% | 9% | 21% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 47.8 6% | 52 -2% | 44 14% | 35.2 31% |
Maximum Bottom * | 56 | 54.4 3% | 53 5% | 50 11% | 32.5 42% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 27.4 6% | 29.3 -1% | 29 -0% | 29.4 -1% |
Idle Bottom * | 34 | 32 6% | 30.2 11% | 31 9% | 29.6 13% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 0.4 / 1.8 Watt |
Üresjárat | 10 / 12 / 17 Watt |
Terhelés |
108 / 182 Watt |
Kulcs:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -32% | -7% | -17% | -8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 10 | 14.9 -49% | 10.6 -6% | 11 -10% | 9 10% |
Idle Average * | 12 | 17.5 -46% | 13.1 -9% | 15 -25% | 12.6 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 17 | 29.5 -74% | 15.8 7% | 25 -47% | 17 -0% |
Load Average * | 108 | 94.8 12% | 131 -21% | 95 12% | 115 -6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 123 | 146.1 -19% | 146 -19% | 140 -14% | 159 -29% |
Load Maximum * | 182 | 210.9 -16% | 169 7% | 211 -16% | 216 -19% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akkumulátor üzemidő | -13% | -12% | -26% | -35% | |
Reader / Idle | 728 | 614 -16% | 522 -28% | 495 -32% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 564 | 413 -27% | 366 -35% | 378 -33% | 204 -64% |
Load | 90 | 94 4% | 113 26% | 78 -13% | 85 -6% |
H.264 | 437 | 92 |
Pro
Kontra
A GeForce RTX 3080 laptop verziója csak korlátozottan képes a benne rejlő potenciált kibontakoztatni az Asus alacsony TDP beállítása miatt, és lassúbb lehet, mint egy gyors RTX 3070 laptop, de ettől eltekintve a ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q egy vonzó gép.
Egyik legnagyobb fénypontja a WQHD panel, amely 165 Hz-es, aránylag gyors válaszidővel, FreeSync-kel és jó színtérlefedettséggel vonzza a vásárlókat.
További vonzó jellemzők a meglepően gazdag hangzás, a hosszú üzemidő és a letisztult dizájn. Ami a külsőt illeti, a fehér kiadás szépen kiemelkedik a mezőnyből.
Ami nem tetszett túlságosan, az 3D módban a zajszint, valamint a billentyűzet elrendezése. Az is bosszantó, hogy az Asus kihagyta a webkamerát, és a RAM részben az alaplapra van forrasztva.
Ár és elérhetőség
Nemsokára 2499,99 dollárért beszerezhető lesz a mi tesztkonfigurációnk is egyenesen a gyártótól. Egy 16 GB RAM-os RTX 3070-es verzió is beszerezhető lesz Eclipse Gray színben a BestBuy-on 1799,99 dollárért.
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
-
01/31/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser