Az AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX egy mobil szörnyeteg: Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX551QS Laptop rövid értékelés
potential competitors in comparison
Értékelés | Dátum | Model | Súly | Magasság | Méret | Felbontás | Legjobb ár |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 20.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.5 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
85.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.6 % v7 (old) | Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS i9-9900KS, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 3.6 kg | 38 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
84.6 % v7 (old) | 12/2020 | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 2.4 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
Case
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Input Devices
|
Fényerő megoszlás: 88 %
Centrumban: 210 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 967:1 (Fekete: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.63
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS AU Optronics B156ZAN05.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS AU Optronics B156HAN07.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS-Level, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | -17% | -24% | -18% | -17% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 89.1 | 87 -2% | 70.2 -21% | 63.6 -29% | 68 -24% | 69.7 -22% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99 -1% | 90.9 -9% | 99 -1% | 99.7 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.1 | 99.9 1% | 71.4 -28% | 64.7 -35% | 69.8 -30% | 71.1 -28% |
Response Times | -362% | 20% | -55% | -50% | -32% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8.2 ? | 56.4 ? -588% | 6 ? 27% | 16.8 ? -105% | 16.4 ? -100% | 14 ? -71% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 24.4 ? -135% | 9 ? 13% | 10.8 ? -4% | 10.4 ? -0% | 9.6 ? 8% |
PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | |||||
Screen | 28% | 15% | -18% | 15% | 10% | |
Brightness middle | 406 | 398 -2% | 347 -15% | 258.8 -36% | 291 -28% | 283 -30% |
Brightness | 407 | 385 -5% | 328 -19% | 258 -37% | 278 -32% | 289 -29% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 89 1% | 82 -7% | 91 3% | 90 2% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.28 33% | 0.285 32% | 0.28 33% | 0.25 40% | 0.24 43% |
Contrast | 967 | 1421 47% | 1218 26% | 924 -4% | 1164 20% | 1179 22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.36 | 1.53 65% | 2.35 46% | 4.45 -2% | 1.19 73% | 2.26 48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.55 | 3.69 51% | 4.15 45% | 9.85 -30% | 3.04 60% | 5.64 25% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.63 | 0.77 79% | 1.16 68% | 3 17% | 1.11 69% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 2.4 23% | 3.04 2% | 5.8 -87% | 1.9 39% | 3.4 -10% |
Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.19 100% | 2.35 94% | 2.36 93% | 2.216 99% | 2.228 99% |
CCT | 6371 102% | 6996 93% | 6658 98% | 7651 85% | 7018 93% | 7249 90% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 86.7 | 100 15% | 65 -25% | 58.8 -32% | 70 -19% | 71 -18% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99 -1% | 90.5 -9% | 92 -8% | 93 -7% |
Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | -111% /
-26% | 6% /
9% | -32% /
-24% | -18% /
-0% | -13% /
0% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Megjelenítési válaszidők
↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
---|---|---|
10.4 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 5.2 ms emelkedés | |
↘ 5.2 ms ősz | ||
A képernyő jó reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, de túl lassú lehet a versenyképes játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (21 ms). | ||
↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
8.2 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 3 ms emelkedés | |
↘ 5.2 ms ősz | ||
A képernyő gyors reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és játékra is alkalmasnak kell lennie. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (32.9 ms). |
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Screen Size, Native Resolution | 14.09-inches, 3840 x 1100 (4K SKUs), 1920 x 550 (FHD SKUs) |
Color Space | 95.3 percent sRGB, 62.6 percent AdobeRGB |
Black-White Response Times | 18 ms rise, 14 ms fall |
Gray-Gray Response Times | 21.2 ms rise, 19.2 ms fall |
Maximum Brightness | 368.5 nits |
Contrast Ratio | 2632:1 |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 | 2.79 |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 | 4.3 |
Gamma | 2.43 |
CCT | 6540 |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (2242 - 5476, n=30) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (471 - 584, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (1076 - 2267, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (197 - 243, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (219 - 442, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (4791 - 5905, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (36011 - 62503, n=29) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (1271 - 1574, n=27) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (5057 - 9294, n=27) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (8.26 - 17.1, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (44.1 - 87.4, n=29) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (0.48 - 0.599, n=29) |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... a kisebb jobb
PCMark 10 | |
Score | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Essentials | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Productivity | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Digital Content Creation | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4414 pontok | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5006 pontok | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6807 pontok | |
Segítség |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Storage Devices
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -11% | -16% | 11% | -10% | |
Seq Read | 3010 | 2981 -1% | 2280 -24% | 2979 -1% | 1065 -65% |
Seq Write | 3116 | 2783 -11% | 2198 -29% | 2581 -17% | 2360 -24% |
4K Read | 49.58 | 43.98 -11% | 31.67 -36% | 47.33 -5% | 48.09 -3% |
4K Write | 185 | 113.9 -38% | 127.3 -31% | 140 -24% | 110.7 -40% |
4K-64 Read | 1401 | 1519 8% | 1293 -8% | 1710 22% | 1635 17% |
4K-64 Write | 1426 | 1296 -9% | 2124 49% | 2188 53% | 1829 28% |
Access Time Read * | 0.037 | 0.062 -68% | 0.078 -111% | 0.05 -35% | 0.071 -92% |
Access Time Write * | 0.061 | 0.033 46% | 0.098 -61% | 0.026 57% | 0.034 44% |
Score Read | 1751 | 1861 6% | 1552 -11% | 2055 17% | 1790 2% |
Score Write | 1923 | 1688 -12% | 2471 28% | 2586 34% | 2176 13% |
Score Total | 4580 | 4492 -2% | 4811 5% | 5673 24% | 4950 8% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 3196 | 2438 -24% | 3007 -6% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 710 | 604 -15% | 731 3% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1669 | 1404 -16% | 1756 5% | ||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -18% | -19% | -20% | -28% | |
Write 4K | 229.7 | 127.6 -44% | 188.8 -18% | 158.2 -31% | 131.3 -43% |
Read 4K | 47.13 | 48.4 3% | 63.5 35% | 50.7 8% | 45.84 -3% |
Write Seq | 4455 | 2958 -34% | 1836 -59% | 1790 -60% | 2370 -47% |
Read Seq | 2933 | 2984 2% | 1891 -36% | 2469 -16% | 1509 -49% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 597 | 472.7 -21% | 490.5 -18% | 503 -16% | 481.5 -19% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 387 | 529 37% | 571 48% | 579 50% | 560 45% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 5623 | 3431 -39% | 2334 -58% | 3102 -45% | 2392 -57% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 7042 | 3536 -50% | 3559 -49% | 3413 -52% | 3232 -54% |
Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | -15% /
-13% | -18% /
-17% | -5% /
-2% | -19% /
-18% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (31288 - 43744, n=40) | |
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (31826 - 38809, n=17) | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING | |
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (10637 - 20233, n=39) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio | |
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (9038 - 18934, n=17) | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW |
3DMark 11 Performance | 29192 pontok | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 51675 pontok | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25362 pontok | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11194 pontok | |
Segítség |
alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 374 | 186.2 | ||||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 341.7 | 187.2 | 104.6 | 80.4 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 144 | 139 | 124 | 119 | 99.9 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 177 | 133 | 105 | 81.3 | 49.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 107 | 93 | 77 | 60.9 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 138 | 119 | 114 | 107 | 96 | 59 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 346 | 205 | 188 | 174 | 136 | 84.2 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 140 | 123 | 121 | 116 | 93 | 55 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 270.2 | 148.6 | 108.4 | 83.8 | 56.8 | 29 |
Doom Eternal (2020) | 323.2 | 197.5 | 183.1 | 183.7 | 145.8 | 83.4 |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 127.6 | 187.8 | 142.8 | 114.7 | 85.9 | 47.2 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 256 | 199 | 191 | 150 | 119 | 73 |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -20% | -13% | -9% | -30% | -25% | |
off / környezet * | 27 | 30 -11% | 30.1 -11% | 28.1 -4% | 30 -11% | 30 -11% |
Idle Minimum * | 27 | 33 -22% | 30.1 -11% | 28.5 -6% | 30 -11% | 32 -19% |
Idle Average * | 27 | 34 -26% | 30.1 -11% | 28.7 -6% | 35 -30% | 34 -26% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 35 -30% | 30.1 -11% | 29.5 -9% | 44 -63% | 39 -44% |
Load Average * | 31.2 | 48 -54% | 46.8 -50% | 31.2 -0% | 53 -70% | 53 -70% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.5 | 48 -8% | 48.4 -9% | 55.1 -24% | 53 -19% | 48 -8% |
Load Maximum * | 53.5 | 49 8% | 46 14% | 59.3 -11% | 55 -3% | 53 1% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Zajszint
Üresjárat |
| 27 / 27 / 27 dB(A) |
Terhelés |
| 31.2 / 53.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm távolságról) környezeti zaj: 27 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
CPU Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | Average CPU Temperature (°C) | Average GPU Temperature (°C) | |
Prime95 Stress (Performance mode) | 3.8 | -- | 91 | 65 |
Prime95 Stress (Turbo mode) | 4.0 - 4.4 | -- | 75 | 47 |
FurMark Stress (Turbo mode) | -- | 1185 | 67 | 69 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress (Turbo mode) | 0.4 - 4.4 | ~1530 | 78 | 62 |
Witcher 3 Stress (Performance mode) | 3.2 | 1650 | 76 | 80 |
Witcher 3 Stress (Turbo mode) | 3.2 | 1770 | 65 | 68 |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 0.04 / 1.3 Watt |
Üresjárat | 16.3 / 22.5 / 39.9 Watt |
Terhelés |
116.1 / 196.7 Watt |
Kulcs:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS i9-9900KS, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -16% | 26% | -57% | 16% | 14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 16.3 | 23 -41% | 10.6 35% | 33.4 -105% | 6 63% | 13 20% |
Idle Average * | 22.5 | 30 -33% | 13.1 42% | 40.5 -80% | 14 38% | 16 29% |
Idle Maximum * | 39.9 | 39 2% | 15.8 60% | 44 -10% | 25 37% | 27 32% |
Load Average * | 116.1 | 156 -34% | 131 -13% | 121.9 -5% | 108 7% | 109 6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 181.2 | 152 16% | 146 19% | 258.2 -42% | 195 -8% | 155 14% |
Load Maximum * | 196.7 | 208 -6% | 169 14% | 397.6 -102% | 280 -42% | 236 -20% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS i9-9900KS, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 82 Wh | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 99.99 Wh | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akkumulátor üzemidő | -7% | 34% | -48% | 26% | 28% | |
Reader / Idle | 407 | 480 18% | 522 28% | 454 12% | 505 24% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 315 | 185 -41% | 366 16% | 165 -48% | 364 16% | 364 16% |
Load | 71 | 72 1% | 113 59% | 106 49% | 102 44% |
Pro
Kontra
Összegzés
Kívülről mem tűnik úgy. de a régebbi GX550-hez képest az Asus nagy belső javításokat vitt véghez a teljesítmény növelése érdekében. Az csúcskategóriás gamer notebookokat ma már nem kizárólag az Intel Core sorozattal szükséges felszerelni, mivel az AMD Ryzen opciók már a leggyorsabb 10. generációs Core i9 rendszereket is felülmúlták, beleértve az Asus saját Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550 notebookját.
A Zen 3 CPU-n kívül az új 120 Hz-es 4K panel is elismerést igényel. A 15.6 hüvelykes 4K panelek többségével ellentétben az új panel rövidebb fekete-fehér és szürke-szürke válaszidőkkel rendelkezik, amelyek most már jóval közelebb állnak a megszokott 144 Hz-es, 240 Hz-es vagy 300 Hz-es 1080p opciókhoz. A különbség többnyire a pörgős 3D játékok közben érzékelhető.
Nem olcsó, de az Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS új hardverrel sűrűn megpakolt, így jócskán felülmúlja az elődjét. A ScreenPad egyáltalán nem változott, kivéve a simább felhasználói felületet, amelyet a GX550 is megkap.
A legnagyobb gond az új előnyökkel az, hogy nem kizárólag a GX551 rendelkezik velük. Előbb-utóbb más laptopok is megkapják ugyanazokat a CPU, GPU és 4K kijelző opciókat, így hasonló teljesítményszintet érnek el. Továbbá, a ház és a ScreenPad nem változott, ami azt jelenti, hogy a tavalyi GX550 minden hátránya itt is megtalálható. Akinek a GX550-ben nem tetszett a sekély billentyűzet, az apró érintőpad, a széles méretek vagy a webkamera hiánya, annak a véleménye valószínűleg a GX551-gyel sem fog megváltozni. A ventilátorok pulzálásán játék közben és Teljesítmény üzemmódban szintén javíthattak volna.
Ár és elérhetőség
A Newegg jelenleg 2900 dollárért árusít egy kisebb, GeForce RTX 3070-nel felszerelt GX551QR konfigurációt. Az Xotic PC a mi egzakt konfigurációnkat árulja 3700 dollárért.
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
- 02/07/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo