Gigabyte Aero 14 (7700HQ, GTX 1060) Laptop rövid értékelés
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Razer Blade (2016) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
Razer Blade (2016) | |
SCHENKER XMG P407 |
|
Fényerő megoszlás: 79 %
Centrumban: 290 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 967:1 (Fekete: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 4.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Gigabyte Aero 14 LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A), , 2560x1440, 14" | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, , 1920x1080, 14" | SCHENKER XMG P407 LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), , 1920x1080, 14" | Razer Blade (2016) Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), , 3200x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | -6% | 4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 65.5 2% | 64.5 0% | 66.9 4% |
sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 86.4 -6% | 82.1 -11% | 96.8 5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 63.1 -4% | 60 -8% | 68.2 4% |
Response Times | 13% | -12% | -24% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 31.6 ? 23% | 47 ? -15% | 41 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 24.4 ? 2% | 27 ? -8% | 37 ? -48% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||
Screen | 10% | 3% | 30% | |
Brightness middle | 290 | 288.4 -1% | 298 3% | 328 13% |
Brightness | 257 | 282 10% | 282 10% | 328 28% |
Brightness Distribution | 79 | 83 5% | 80 1% | 69 -13% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.35 -17% | 0.27 10% | 0.22 27% |
Contrast | 967 | 824 -15% | 1104 14% | 1491 54% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.59 | 2.61 43% | 4.42 4% | 1.91 58% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.68 | 7.34 15% | 8.57 1% | 3.23 63% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.32 | 1.18 73% | 4.11 5% | 1.69 61% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.5 88% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 7320 89% | 6506 100% | 6329 103% | 6418 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 56.4 -4% | 54 -8% | 63 7% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 86.4 -6% | 82 -11% | 97 5% |
Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | 7% /
8% | -5% /
-1% | 3% /
18% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Megjelenítési válaszidők
↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
---|---|---|
25 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 4 ms emelkedés | |
↘ 21 ms ősz | ||
A képernyő viszonylag lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és túl lassú lehet a játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
41 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 17 ms emelkedés | |
↘ 24 ms ősz | ||
A képernyő lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és nem lesz kielégítő a játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (33.2 ms). |
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17365 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
Razer Blade (2016) | |
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
Razer Blade (2016) |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
Razer Blade (2016) | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
Razer Blade (2016) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3717 pontok | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4702 pontok | |
Segítség |
Gigabyte Aero 14 LiteOn CX2-8B256 | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | SCHENKER XMG P407 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e | Razer Blade (2016) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -68% | 19% | -12% | |
Read Seq | 1584 | 335.3 -79% | 1345 -15% | 1296 -18% |
Write Seq | 795 | 299 -62% | 1502 89% | 603 -24% |
Read 512 | 985 | 223 -77% | 320.3 -67% | 655 -34% |
Write 512 | 814 | 246.7 -70% | 1276 57% | 604 -26% |
Read 4k | 44.93 | 17.68 -61% | 58.9 31% | 42.22 -6% |
Write 4k | 131.2 | 35.31 -73% | 171 30% | 139.6 6% |
Read 4k QD32 | 602 | 247.4 -59% | 625 4% | 573 -5% |
Write 4k QD32 | 441 | 156.3 -65% | 539 22% | 480 9% |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
Razer Blade (2016) | |
SCHENKER XMG P407 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
Razer Blade (2016) | |
SCHENKER XMG P407 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11868 pontok | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20574 pontok | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9778 pontok | |
Segítség |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
Razer Blade (2016) |
alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 38.3 | |||
Anno 2205 (2015) | 77.5 | 29 | ||
The Division (2016) | 46.9 | 37.8 | ||
For Honor (2017) | 56 () | 42 () | ||
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 66.2 | 60.1 | 35.7 |
Zajszint
Üresjárat |
| 31 / 32 / 33 dB(A) |
Terhelés |
| 42 / 53 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58.3 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.8 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.7 °C / -10.3 F).
Gigabyte Aero 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade (2016) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG P407 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | ![]() ![]() |
Üresjárat | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Terhelés |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -28% | -10% | -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8 | 12.1 -51% | 10 -25% | 9 -13% |
Idle Average * | 13 | 19 -46% | 15 -15% | 14 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 20 | 19.5 2% | 24 -20% | 22 -10% |
Load Average * | 78 | 106.7 -37% | 82 -5% | 72 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 110 | |||
Load Maximum * | 146 | 159 -9% | 124 15% | 124 15% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94 Wh | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 61 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Akkumulátor üzemidő | -42% | -45% | -54% | |
Reader / Idle | 909 | 577 -37% | 443 -51% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 524 | 261 -50% | 241 -54% | 243 -54% |
Load | 129 | 78 -40% | 92 -29% | |
H.264 | 213 |
Pro
Kontra
Tehát minden pöpec? Nos, majdnem. Az átlag Aero 14 felhasználó számára a negatívumok többsége valószínűleg érdektelen lesz. Viszont a közepes fordulatszámnál nagyon idegesítően visító ventilátorral a Gigabyte-nek sürgősen kezdenie kellene valamit.
Ezt leszámítva az Aero 14 nagyon jó összbenyomást keltett. A masszív telep ellenére az alu ház kompakt és könnyű. A beviteli eszközök még irodai laptopokhoz is megfelelnének, eltekintve a nem szabványos billentyűzetelrendezéstől, amely egyértelműen játékosok miatt lett ilyen (plusz: makrógombok). A csatlakozók terén is jobban teljesít, mint amit elvárhatunk tőle, még egy USB-Ethernet adaptert is mellékelnek hozzá. A teljesítményére sem lehet panaszunk.
Masszív telepe, és az ennek köszönhető üzemidő az, amely kiemeli a Gigabyte Aero 14-et mobil gaming noteszgép társai közül. Ezt azonban sajnos beárnyékolja a ventilátor nagyon idegesítő, magas hangú nyüszítése, amely miatt egyszerűen nem ajánljuk ezt a laptopot.
Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.
Gigabyte Aero 14
-
06/30/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn