Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
ChineseMobil GeForce RTX 4080 debütálás: Razer Blade 16 (korai) 2023 laptop rövid értékelés
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (Blade 16 Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i9-13950HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.5 GHz, 138 W PL2 / Short Burst, 109 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 GB VRAM, Mag: 1995 MHz, Memória: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR6, 528.36, Advanced Optimus
Memória
32 GB
, SK Hynix, DDR5-5600, Kétcsatornás, 22-16-16-51
Kijelző
16.00 hüvelyk 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, fényes: nem, 240 Hz
Alaplap
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Háttértár
SSSTC CA6-8D1024, 1024 GB
Súly
2.423 kg, Tápegység: 959 g
Ár
3600 USD
Hivatkozások
Megjegyzés: A gyártó különböző beszállítóktól származó alkatrészeket használhat, beleértve a hasonló specifikációjú kijelzőpaneleket, meghajtókat vagy memóriastickeket.
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Értékelés | Dátum | Model | Súly | Magasság | Méret | Felbontás | Legjobb ár |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91.2 % v7 (old) | 05/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.3 % v7 (old) | 06/2022 | Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89.3 % v7 (old) | 01/2023 | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S | 2.2 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 01/2023 | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.2 % v7 (old) | 08/2022 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 20.5 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 02/2023 | HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M | 2.4 kg | 22.6 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1371 (1036-1505)
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1696 (1619-1817)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1283-1580)
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1367 (1337-1417)
6.2 ∆E
10 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 466.8 cd/m² (Nits) Átlag: 437.3 cd/m² Minimum: 23.81 cd/m²Fényerő megoszlás: 83 %
Centrumban: 456.8 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1305:1 (Fekete: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.66
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell G16 7620 BOE NE16QDM, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16" | HP Omen 16-n0033dx BOE0AAE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -25% | -17% | -18% | -2% | -14% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.5 | 65.3 -34% | 69.8 -29% | 68.3 -31% | 98 -1% | 74.4 -24% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 85.1 -15% | 98.1 -2% | 98 -2% | 99.9 0% | 99.2 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.7 | 67.4 -25% | 71.9 -20% | 70.5 -21% | 86.3 -4% | 73.4 -18% |
| Response Times | 24% | -30% | -9% | -34% | -80% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.6 ? | 4.3 ? 35% | 10 ? -52% | 8.6 ? -30% | 14.6 ? -121% | 17.6 ? -167% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 10.5 ? 12% | 12.8 ? -7% | 10.4 ? 13% | 5.6 ? 53% | 11.2 ? 7% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | 16% | 9% | -7% | -21% | -28% | |
| Brightness middle | 456.8 | 330 -28% | 492.4 8% | 369.4 -19% | 459 0% | 373.3 -18% |
| Brightness | 437 | 315 -28% | 471 8% | 348 -20% | 434 -1% | 361 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 89 7% | 90 8% | 83 0% | 88 6% | 79 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.24 31% | 0.4 -14% | 0.32 9% | 0.44 -26% | 0.44 -26% |
| Contrast | 1305 | 1375 5% | 1231 -6% | 1154 -12% | 1043 -20% | 848 -35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 1.47 60% | 1.9 49% | 1.78 52% | 2.97 20% | 2.12 43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.42 | 2.73 57% | 3.81 41% | 4.41 31% | 8.13 -27% | 5.62 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.66 | 0.63 5% | 0.99 -50% | 1.22 -85% | 1.03 -56% | 2.06 -212% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 1.8 31% | 1.7 35% | 3.2 -23% | 4.9 -88% | 2.5 4% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.282 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.2 100% | 2.235 98% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6108 106% | 6499 100% | 6497 100% | 6750 96% | 6775 96% | 6408 101% |
| Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | 5% /
8% | -13% /
-2% | -11% /
-10% | -19% /
-19% | -41% /
-33% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Megjelenítési válaszidők
ℹ
A kijelző válaszideje azt mutatja, hogy a képernyő milyen gyorsan képes egyik színről a másikra váltani. A lassú válaszidők utóképekhez vezethetnek, és a mozgó tárgyak elmosódottak lehetnek (szellemképek). A gyors tempójú 3D-s címek játékosainak különösen oda kell figyelniük a gyors válaszidőkre.| ↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 6.8 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő jó reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, de túl lassú lehet a versenyképes játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
| 6.6 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 3.4 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 3.2 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő tesztjeinkben nagyon gyors reakciósebességet mutatott, és nagyon jól használható gyors tempójú játékokhoz. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (32.9 ms). | ||
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
ℹ
A képernyő tompításához egyes notebookok egyszerűen be- és kikapcsolják a háttérvilágítást gyors egymásutánban - ez az úgynevezett impulzusszélesség-moduláció (PWM) módszer. Ennek a ciklikus frekvenciának ideális esetben az emberi szem számára nem észlelhetőnek kell lennie. Ha ez a frekvencia túl alacsony, az érzékeny szemű felhasználóknak megerőltető lehet, fejfájást okozhat, vagy akár észre is vehetik a villódzást.| Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2304 (2277.39-2359.33)
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2526 (2479.7-2651.64)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2136 (2104.6-2150.88)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng -1! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (24560 - 33277, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (1952 - 2113, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (8697 - 12648, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (742 - 816, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (3625 - 5227, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (274 - 303, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (100 - 137, n=7) | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (99351 - 127295, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (6445 - 7064, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (16776 - 21853, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (1805 - 2097, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (26 - 34.5, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (32.8 - 52.1, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (0.3823 - 0.4121, n=7) | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (18131 - 28957, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (102591 - 144303, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (4981 - 7093, n=7) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (131931 - 140103, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (12381 - 17057, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (46539 - 71038, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (99981 - 204491, n=7) | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (1472 - 2069, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (9787 - 15573, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (40233 - 50864, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7888 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (61938 - 78494, n=7) | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (62368 - 86207, n=7) | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (59501 - 80441, n=7) | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Az osztály átlaga Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, az elmúlt 2 évben) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (84.4 - 99.5, n=7) | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
* ... a kisebb jobb
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
* ... a kisebb jobb
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6752 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4767 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
684.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
608.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
4110 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
4019 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
74.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
203.8 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023: Ø6412 (5645.36-6872.58)
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition -2! | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3080 SG -3! | |
| Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -3! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX -4! | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) -5! | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 -4! | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 -3! | |
| Dell G16 7620 -3! | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx -2! | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (45199 - 63128, n=24) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3080 SG | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3080 SG | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (146413 - 189320, n=22) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
| Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| GFXBench | |
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (197.2 - 212, n=2) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (446 - 485, n=2) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 41542 pontok | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 32496 pontok | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 17601 pontok | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 4021 pontok | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 16652 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| Blender | |
| v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (13 - 20, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (21 - 28, n=22) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| HP Omen 16-n0033dx | |
| Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 | |
| MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
| Dell G16 7620 | |
| MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (177 - 337, n=22) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | X-Plane 11.11 | Dota 2 Reborn | Strange Brigade
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.9 (141-179)
| Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | |
| alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD FSR | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K FSR | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 186.6 | 185.2 | 183.4 | 140.7 | 125.2 | 143.7 | ||||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 609.6 | 462.7 | 353.5 | 176.8 | 120.6 | |||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 218 | 204 | 196 | 194.7 | 176.7 | |||||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 195.8 | 184.1 | 157.8 | 120.1 | 74.1 | |||||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 201 | 177.7 | 137 | 117.5 | ||||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 438 | 365 | 351 | 323 | 237 | 122.3 | ||||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 228 | 201 | 196 | 176 | 154 | 84 | ||||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 197 | 170.4 | 145 | 121.7 | 102 | 67 | ||||
| Control (2019) | 239.1 | 204.7 | 157 | 102 | 50.1 | |||||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 207.7 | 176.6 | 158.1 | 133.5 | 108.7 | 59.8 | ||||
| Valorant (2020) | 336 | |||||||||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 128 | 112 | ||||||||
| Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 280.3 | 184 | 171.3 | 121.6 | 70.4 | |||||
| Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 140 | 129 | 121 | 110 | 93 | 56 | ||||
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 181 | 149 | 134 | 125 | 115 | 71 | ||||
| Dying Light 2 (2022) | 184.1 | 160.4 | 140.9 | 97.8 | 48.6 | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 121.1 | 118.1 | 113.8 | 106.2 | 81.2 | 40 | ||||
| Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 198.7 | 159.6 | 154 | 145 | 135.9 | 73.1 | ||||
| The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 177.8 | 159.8 | 119.9 | 120.4 | 93.1 | 55.3 | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 83 | |||||||||
| Skull & Bones (2024) | 50 | |||||||||
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 56.1 | 54.8 | 39.5 | |||||||
| F1 24 (2024) | 226 | 236 | 210 | 85.3 | 59.1 | |||||
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 110 | 89 | 71 | 42 | 47 | 31 | 33 | 18 | ||
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 84.3 | 81.5 | 74.1 | 64.4 | 59.1 | 47.7 | 35.8 | 20.5 |
| LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
| Room GPUs-only | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| Sala GPUs-only | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| SPECviewperf 13 | |
| Solidworks (sw-04) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Siemens NX (snx-03) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Showcase (showcase-02) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| Medical (medical-02) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Maya (maya-05) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| Energy (energy-02) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Creo (creo-02) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| Catia (catia-05) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| 3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| SPECviewperf 2020 | |
| 1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| 1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| 1920x1080 Medical (medical-03) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| 1920x1080 Maya (maya-06) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| 1920x1080 Energy (energy-03) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| 1920x1080 Creo (creo-03) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| 1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| 1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| 3840x2160 Solidworks (solidworks-05) | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
| MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
| Intel Core i5-13400F | |
| ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Zajszint
| Üresjárat |
| 23 / 23 / 23.6 dB(A) |
| Terhelés |
| 39 / 51.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm távolságról) környezeti zaj: 23 dB(A) | ||
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Dell G16 7620 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 512GB | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0) | HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | 3% | -6% | -9% | -9% | -4% | 2% | |
| off / környezet * | 23 | 26 -13% | 23.1 -0% | 23.2 -1% | 26 -13% | 24.2 -5% | 22.7 1% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23 | 26 -13% | 23.1 -0% | 28.3 -23% | 26 -13% | 27.4 -19% | 22.9 -0% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 23 | 27 -17% | 23.1 -0% | 28.8 -25% | 27 -17% | 27.4 -19% | 22.9 -0% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.6 | 29 -23% | 23.1 2% | 28.9 -22% | 29 -23% | 28.9 -22% | 22.9 3% | 23 3% |
| Load Average * | 39 | 37 5% | 31.4 19% | 32.4 17% | 41 -5% | 32.3 17% | 44.4 -14% | 36.92 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.6 | 44 15% | 51.4 -0% | 48.3 6% | 48 7% | 54.1 -5% | 55.7 -8% | 50 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.3 | 45 12% | 51.2 -0% | 48.1 6% | 50 3% | 57.6 -12% | 57.4 -12% | 50 3% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6800S | Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -27% | -5% | -3% | -13% | -4% | 6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40 | 53 -33% | 46.6 -17% | 47.6 -19% | 45 -13% | 41.2 -3% | 34.4 14% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 37.6 | 53 -41% | 50.8 -35% | 54 -44% | 50 -33% | 53.2 -41% | 42 -12% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.4 | 36 -11% | 26.4 19% | 23 29% | 33 -2% | 26.4 19% | 24 26% |
| Idle Bottom * | 31.4 | 38 -21% | 27.2 13% | 24.6 22% | 33 -5% | 27.8 11% | 33.2 -6% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Frekvenciadiagram (a jelölőnégyzetek be- és kipipálhatók az eszközök összehasonlításához)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energiafogyasztás
| Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 2 / 2.9 Watt |
| Üresjárat | 15.2 / 22.8 / 49.8 Watt |
| Terhelés |
121.2 / 273.7 Watt |
   
| |
Kulcs:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 512GB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0), IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16" | HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 23% | 36% | 20% | 9% | 36% | 11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15.2 | 17 -12% | 8.8 42% | 14.4 5% | 19 -25% | 7.9 48% | 16.1 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 22.8 | 19 17% | 14.7 36% | 17.8 22% | 24 -5% | 11.5 50% | 17.1 25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 49.8 | 25 50% | 19.8 60% | 31.5 37% | 31 38% | 18.3 63% | 26.6 47% |
| Load Average * | 121.2 | 108 11% | 85.3 30% | 101.2 17% | 104 14% | 88.1 27% | 116.3 4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 242 | 150 38% | 167.5 31% | 176.9 27% | 186.5 23% | 206 15% | 237 2% |
| Load Maximum * | 273.7 | 179 35% | 230.7 16% | 242.9 11% | 256 6% | 246.4 10% | 291.1 -6% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø242 (238-248)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø229 (225-233)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø203 (150.8-274)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø196.2 (178.1-244)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15.5 (11.1-24.6)
Power Consumption external Monitor
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø182.4 (173.7-211)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø70.2 (67.8-85.6)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø191.7 (184.9-193.8)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.7 (74.7-103.7)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø242 (232-253)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø221 (213-227)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø236 (225-245)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø220 (215-227)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø14.2 (11.6-16.9)
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S, 71 Wh | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M, 68 Wh | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akkumulátor üzemidő | 7% | 2% | -29% | 15% | 4% | 15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 533 | 484 -9% | 426 -20% | 749 41% | 599 12% | 505 -5% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 365 | 293 -20% | 374 2% | 297 -19% | 469 28% | 418 15% | 336 -8% |
| Load | 81 | 122 51% | 43 -47% | 62 -23% | 68 -16% | 128 58% | |
| H.264 | 356 | 559 |
Pro
+ könnyű szervizelhetőség; 2x SODIMM + 2x PCIe4 SSD
+ kiváló minőségű 240 Hz-es QHD+ G-Sync kijelző
+ viszonylag vékony 330 W-os hálózati adapter
+ magas, 175 W-os TGP
+ jó üzemidő
Kontra
- >50 dB(A) Teljesítmény üzemmódban játék közben
- még mindig nincs folyékony fém hővezető felület
- vastagabb, mint más Blade modellek
- nagy energiafogyasztás
- drága
Összegzés - Egy Jobb, de Nagyobb Blade
A Razer első 16 hüvelykes Blade-jeként a Blade 16 minden jót kipipál, beleértve a CPU teljesítményt, a GPU teljesítményt és az összetéveszthetetlen Razer dizájnt. A 175 W-os GPU különösen lenyűgöző, mivel a tavalyi alternatívák, mint a Legion Slim 7 16 vagy az Omen 16, ehhez képest alacsonyabb teljesítményű ~100 W-os GPU-kkal rendelkeznek. Mindazonáltal a konkurens gyártók modelljeinek jobban kell teljesíteniük, amint megfelelően frissülnek a hasonló 13. generációs Intel CPU és GeForce 40 GPU opciókkal. A közelgő Alienware x16 az új Blade eddigi legígéretesebb ellenfele.
Az új 330 W-os GaN AC adapter is dicséretet érdemel, mivel a többi gyártó AC adapterei továbbra is sokkal nagyobb méretűek. A sokat utazó felhasználók mindenképpen értékelhetik a Razer ezen előnyét.
A Blade 16 és vékony AC-adaptere jobban egyensúlyozza a teljesítményt és a hordozhatóságot, mint eddig bármely más 16 hüvelykes gamer laptop. A vastagabb kialakítás azonban arra késztethet egyes felhasználókat, hogy inkább az új Blade 15-re várjanak.
A generációról generációra történő teljesítménynövekedésért cserébe talán a nagyobb energiafogyasztás és a vastagabb profil a legszembetűnőbb kompromisszumok. A Blade 16 játék közben több energiát fogyaszt, mint a legtöbb meglévő 12. generációs RTX 3080-as laptop, ezért szükség van a nagyobb teljesítményű, 330 W-os hálózati adapterre. Az ebből adódó magasabb hűtési igény miatt a Blade 16-ot a sorozat eddigi legvastagabb modellje lett, beleértve még a Blade 17-et is. A 16 hüvelykes méretet tekintve még mindig elegáns kialakítású, de biztosan nem olyan kompakt vagy hordozható, mint a Blade 15.
Egyéb kisebb hátrányok, mint például a „szivacsos” érintőpad és a hangos ventilátorok, sok gamer laptopnál megszokottak.
Ami a mobil GeForce RTX 4080-at illeti, az nézőponttól függően lenyűgöző vagy kiábrándító lehet. Laptopok szempontjából ez egy tiszteletreméltó ugrás a mobil RTX 3080-hoz képest, különösen a DLSS 3.0 engedélyezésével. Az asztali számítógépek szempontjából azonban sokkal lassúbb, mint az RTX 4080 vagy akár a mobil RTX 3080 és az asztali RTX 3080. A mobil és asztali grafikus kártyák közötti egyre szélesedő teljesítménykülönbség miatt az Nvidia talán megfontolhatja, hogy újra bevezeti az "M" utótagot a mobil GeForce széria esetében.
Price and Availability
A Razer és a Best Buy most 3600 dollárért árulja ezt a Blade 16 konfigurációt. Eközben az Amazon a magasabb kategóriás RTX 4090 konfigurációt 4300 dollárért kínálja.
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
- 02/06/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
