Razer Blade 18 laptop rövid értékelés: Kisebb, mint sok más 17 hüvelykes gamer laptop
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Értékelés | Dátum | Model | Súly | Magasság | Méret | Felbontás | Legjobb ár |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91.4 % v7 (old) | 03/2023 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 21.9 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.9 % v7 (old) | 09/2022 | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 05/2023 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
83.3 % v7 (old) | Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
86.1 % v7 (old) | 07/2023 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | 3.4 kg | 26.7 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2160 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 01/2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 |
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
|
Fényerő megoszlás: 89 %
Centrumban: 549.6 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1037:1 (Fekete: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.7
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Gigabyte G7 KE AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 2% | -14% | 1% | -0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 96.9 | 99.4 3% | 94.9 -2% | 70.4 -27% | 97.2 0% | 97.1 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.6 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.3 | 87.3 2% | 92.4 8% | 71.7 -16% | 88.4 4% | 84.8 -1% |
Response Times | -25% | -524% | -12% | -168% | -31% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 4.2 ? | 7.5 ? -79% | 38.4 ? -814% | 5 ? -19% | 16.4 ? -290% | 5.7 ? -36% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8 ? | 5.6 ? 30% | 26.6 ? -233% | 8.3 ? -4% | 11.6 ? -45% | 10.1 ? -26% |
PWM Frequency | 2380 ? | |||||
Screen | 24% | 64905% | 19% | -40% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 549.6 | 503 -8% | 606 10% | 307 -44% | 484 -12% | 320 -42% |
Brightness | 524 | 486 -7% | 602 15% | 301 -43% | 449 -14% | 303 -42% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 84 -6% | 93 4% | 93 4% | 87 -2% | 87 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.53 | 0.44 17% | 0.0001 100% | 0.2 62% | 0.55 -4% | 0.3 43% |
Contrast | 1037 | 1143 10% | 6060000 584278% | 1535 48% | 880 -15% | 1067 3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.32 | 1.08 67% | 4.8 -45% | 1.32 60% | 4.8 -45% | 1.1 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.63 | 4.54 32% | 8.2 -24% | 4.6 31% | 7.48 -13% | 2.7 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.7 | 0.6 78% | 1.8 33% | 1.03 62% | 4.74 -76% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.3 35% | 6.5 -225% | 2.1 -5% | 5.5 -175% | 1.1 45% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.151 102% | 2.63 84% | 2.247 98% | 2.42 91% | 2.13 103% |
CCT | 6319 103% | 6541 99% | 6596 99% | 6815 95% | 6148 106% | 6599 98% |
Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | 0% /
12% | 21461% /
41650% | -2% /
8% | -69% /
-49% | -5% /
5% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Megjelenítési válaszidők
↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 3.8 ms emelkedés | |
↘ 4.2 ms ősz | ||
A képernyő gyors reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és játékra is alkalmasnak kell lennie. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
4.2 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 2.1 ms emelkedés | |
↘ 2.1 ms ősz | ||
A képernyő tesztjeinkben nagyon gyors reakciósebességet mutatott, és nagyon jól használható gyors tempójú játékokhoz. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (32.8 ms). |
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R23 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (24560 - 33277, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (1952 - 2113, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (8697 - 12648, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (742 - 816, n=7) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (3625 - 5227, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (274 - 303, n=7) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (100 - 137, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (99351 - 127295, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (6445 - 7064, n=7) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (16776 - 21853, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (1805 - 2097, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (26 - 34.5, n=7) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (32.8 - 52.1, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (0.3823 - 0.4121, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... a kisebb jobb
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (18131 - 28957, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (102591 - 144303, n=7) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (4981 - 7093, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (131931 - 140103, n=7) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (12381 - 17057, n=7) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (46539 - 71038, n=7) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (99981 - 204491, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (1472 - 2069, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (9787 - 15573, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (40233 - 50864, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 Score | 7609 pontok | |
Segítség |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (61938 - 78494, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (62368 - 86207, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (59501 - 80441, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Átlagos Intel Core i9-13950HX (84.4 - 99.5, n=7) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
* ... a kisebb jobb
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio -1! | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) -3! | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 -1! | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E -1! | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI GL75 10SFR -1! |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio | |
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=63) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI GL75 10SFR |
3DMark 11 Performance | 34754 pontok | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 26019 pontok | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12062 pontok | |
Segítség |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 186.1 | 184.7 | 181.6 | 121.4 | 87.6 | 88.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 617 | 405.9 | 240.9 | 113.9 | 72.5 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 225 | 200 | 191 | 178.6 | 145.5 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 231 | 166.9 | 115.2 | 82 | 46.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 203 | 178.9 | 137.9 | 117.7 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 464 | 315 | 243 | 208 | 136.7 | 71.9 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 208.9 | 139.8 | 109.7 | 86.8 | 69 | 44 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 258.5 | 200.1 | 131.8 | 100.3 | 68.7 | 35.7 |
Hitman 3 (2021) | 294.3 | 234 | 208.4 | 197.4 | 129.9 | 68.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 147.8 | 125.7 | 111.5 | 92.1 | 54 | 23.3 |
Zajszint
Üresjárat |
| 23.8 / 23.8 / 26.8 dB(A) |
Terhelés |
| 37.3 / 53.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm távolságról) környezeti zaj: 23.5 dB(A) |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -12% | -17% | -26% | 0% | 5% | |
off / környezet * | 23.5 | 26 -11% | 24.6 -5% | 27 -15% | 23 2% | 23.9 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 26 -9% | 29.2 -23% | 27 -13% | 23 3% | 23.9 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23.8 | 27 -13% | 29.2 -23% | 35 -47% | 28.11 -18% | 23.9 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.8 | 32 -19% | 29.2 -9% | 38 -42% | 28.11 -5% | 23.9 11% |
Load Average * | 37.3 | 50 -34% | 50.7 -36% | 52 -39% | 30.62 18% | 34.3 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 51 -6% | 53.3 -11% | 56 -17% | 49.75 -4% | |
Load Maximum * | 53.5 | 51 5% | 61 -14% | 59 -10% | 50.17 6% | 45.9 14% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -28% | 2% | -17% | -18% | -18% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.2 | 50 -28% | 40.6 -4% | 52 -33% | 53 -35% | 48.8 -24% |
Maximum Bottom * | 35.6 | 56 -57% | 41.1 -15% | 54 -52% | 56 -57% | 52.4 -47% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.8 | 36 -13% | 26.2 18% | 28 12% | 30 6% | 30.4 4% |
Idle Bottom * | 33.2 | 38 -14% | 30.3 9% | 32 4% | 29 13% | 34.1 -3% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 0.27 / 0.98 Watt |
Üresjárat | 24.5 / 34.1 / 47.7 Watt |
Terhelés |
140 / 261 Watt |
Kulcs:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 3840x2160, 17" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 17% | 8% | 32% | 31% | 9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 24.5 | 17 31% | 14 43% | 15 39% | 13 47% | 19.3 21% |
Idle Average * | 34.1 | 23 33% | 21.6 37% | 17 50% | 16.5 52% | 26.5 22% |
Idle Maximum * | 47.7 | 34 29% | 24.8 48% | 24 50% | 17 64% | 27.1 43% |
Load Average * | 140 | 120 14% | 122.5 12% | 111 21% | 93 34% | 141 -1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 202 | 229 -13% | 265 -31% | 174.1 14% | 239 -18% | 225 -11% |
Load Maximum * | 261 | 243 7% | 418 -60% | 208 20% | 251 4% | 307.9 -18% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akkumulátor üzemidő | 9% | 21% | 9% | 28% | 4% | |
Reader / Idle | 420 | 428 2% | 425 1% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 240 | 229 -5% | 319 33% | 317 32% | 290 21% | 250 4% |
Load | 80 | 103 29% | 86 8% | 76 -5% | 107 34% | |
H.264 | 290 | 358 | 132 | 294 |
Pro
Kontra
Összegzés - Szeretjük a Hardvert, Utáljuk a Hibákat
A Blade 16-ot lenyűgözve hagytuk ott, ugyanez viszont nem mondható el a Blade 18-ról. A mi készülékünk komoly problémákat mutatott, beleértve a hibás DLSS 3 teljesítményt egy külső monitoron, a hiányzó G-Sync támogatást, pedig a G-Sync állítólag benne van, és a potenciálisan hibás villogó kijelzőt. Azon gondolkodtunk, hogy visszatartjuk ezt az értékelést, amíg ezeket a problémákat nem javítják ki, de a Blade 18 terjesztése már elkezdődött, ezért úgy éreztük, hogy helyes, ha tájékoztatjuk olvasóinkat, akik esetleg meg szeretnék vásárolni. Ezt az oldalt frissítjük a végleges pontszámmal, amint megfelelő megoldást kapunk a gyártótól.
A Blade 18 potenciálisan a Blade család egy újabb kiváló tagja lehet, ha a fenti problémákat nem vesszük figyelembe. A 18 hüvelykes kijelző gyönyörű és masszív a méretéhez és a súlyához képest. Az a tény, hogy a rendszer nem sokkal nagyobb vagy nehezebb, mint a Blade 17, nagyon vonzóvá teheti azon felhasználók számára, akik esetleg már fontolgatják a Blade 17 vagy más 17 hüvelykes gamer laptop beszerzését. A viszonylag kicsi GaN hálózati adapter tovább növeli a Blade 18 hordozható-DTR hibrid jellegét.
A Blade 18 elsőre óriásinak tűnhet, de valójában nem sokkal nagyobb, mint a meglévő Blade 17. Nagy képernyője és nagy képernyő-készülékház aránya lenyűgöző.
Ami a mobil RTX 4070-et illeti, a teljesítménye játéktól függően csalódást is okozhat. A DLSS 3-at támogató játékok rendkívül simán futnak a mobil RTX 4070-en. Egyébként a tavalyi mobil RTX 3080-hoz vagy egy asztali RTX 3070-hez hasonló teljesítményre számítsunk. Szerencsére a DLSS 3-at támogató játékok listája folyamatosan bővül.
Ez összességében egy erős kezdés a 18 hüvelykes Blade sorozat számára, amelyet a piacra dobást illetően néhány figyelemre méltó probléma árnyékol be. A közelgő Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 és a Dell Alienware m18 bajba sodorhatja a Blade 18-at, ha néhány kulcsfontosságú problémáját nem oldják meg.
(2023. március 8-i frissítés: A Razer a három tapasztalt problémából kettőt kijavított. Először is elérhető egy új BIOS 2.02 frissítés, amely visszaállítja a modell MUX és G-Sync funkcióit. Másodszor, elérhető egy külön Nvidia illesztőprogram-frissítés, amely megoldja a villódzási problémát. Megerősíthetjük, hogy mindkét javítás a telepítés után rendeltetésszerűen működik.
Sajnos a mi készülékünk továbbra is teljesítményproblémákat mutatott, amikor a DLSS 3 engedélyezésével külső monitoron futtattunk játékokat. A Razer még vizsgálja az ügyet, és amint megoldódik, frissítjük ezt a részt)
Ár és Elérhetőség
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.