AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX teljesítmény debütálás: Alienware m16 R1 laptop rövid értékelés
Alienware m16 R1 AMD (m16 R1 2023 Széria)
Processzor
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX 12 x 3 - 5.2 GHz, 133 W PL2 / Short Burst, 118 W PL1 / Sustained, Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 GB VRAM, Mag: 2125 MHz, Memória: 2263 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR6, 536.99, Advanced Optumus, MUX
Memória
16 GB
, SK Hynix DDR5-4800, 40-39-39-77, Kétcsatornás
Kijelző
16.00 hüvelyk 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE NE16NZ4, IPS, BOE0B04, Dell P/N: 7CGF2, fényes: nem, 240 Hz
Alaplap
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Háttértár
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB
Súly
3.11 kg, Tápegység: 1.487 kg
Ár
2700 USD
Hivatkozások
Megjegyzés: A gyártó különböző beszállítóktól származó alkatrészeket használhat, beleértve a hasonló specifikációjú kijelzőpaneleket, meghajtókat vagy memóriastickeket.
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Értékelés | Dátum | Model | Súly | Magasság | Méret | Felbontás | Legjobb ár |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.2 % v7 (old) | 09/2023 | Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 25.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 07/2023 | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 18.57 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | 09/2023 | HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.8 % v7 (old) | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | ||
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 07/2023 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 91.2 % v7 (old) | 05/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1846 (972-2069)
Alienware m16 R1 AMD; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1518 (1336-1650)
11.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
16 ∆E
6 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NE16NZ4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 336.4 cd/m² (Nits) Átlag: 317.5 cd/m² Minimum: 18.2 cd/m²Fényerő megoszlás: 89 %
Centrumban: 329 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1028:1 (Fekete: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.82
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD BOE NE16NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware x16 R1 BOE NE16NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Omen Transcend 16 AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 0% | -16% | -2% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.6 | 99.2 1% | 99.2 1% | 69.5 -30% | 97 -2% | 98.5 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 88.9 | 88.6 0% | 87.6 -1% | 71.6 -19% | 84.9 -4% | 89.7 1% |
| Response Times | -7% | -316% | -33% | 14% | -31% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.1 ? | 5.1 ? -0% | 26.4 ? -418% | 10.9 ? -114% | 5.1 ? -0% | 6.6 ? -29% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9 ? | 10.3 ? -14% | 28.2 ? -213% | 4.6 ? 49% | 6.6 ? 27% | 12 ? -33% |
| PWM Frequency | 3506 ? | |||||
| Screen | 18% | 224% | 23% | 23% | 18% | |
| Brightness middle | 329 | 302.2 -8% | 791.1 140% | 491 49% | 470 43% | 456.8 39% |
| Brightness | 317 | 285 -10% | 800 152% | 472 49% | 459 45% | 437 38% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 95 7% | 91 2% | 93 4% | 83 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.26 19% | 0.04 87% | 0.4 -25% | 0.42 -31% | 0.35 -9% |
| Contrast | 1028 | 1162 13% | 19778 1824% | 1228 19% | 1119 9% | 1305 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.71 | 1.63 56% | 4.37 -18% | 1.6 57% | 1.86 50% | 3.7 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.23 | 4.13 43% | 10.39 -44% | 5.15 29% | 3.87 46% | 6.42 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.82 | 1.17 59% | 1.04 63% | 0.97 66% | 0.93 67% | 0.66 77% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.5 -14% | 6.5 -195% | 3 -36% | 2.7 -23% | 2.6 -18% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.28 96% | 2.211 100% | 2.246 98% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6270 104% | 6590 99% | 6000 108% | 6979 93% | 6711 97% | 6108 106% |
| Teljes átlag (program / beállítások) | 4% /
10% | -31% /
99% | -9% /
7% | 12% /
17% | -4% /
7% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Megjelenítési válaszidők
ℹ
A kijelző válaszideje azt mutatja, hogy a képernyő milyen gyorsan képes egyik színről a másikra váltani. A lassú válaszidők utóképekhez vezethetnek, és a mozgó tárgyak elmosódottak lehetnek (szellemképek). A gyors tempójú 3D-s címek játékosainak különösen oda kell figyelniük a gyors válaszidőkre.| ↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 4.8 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 4.2 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő gyors reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és játékra is alkalmasnak kell lennie. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
| 5.1 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 2.5 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 2.6 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő tesztjeinkben nagyon gyors reakciósebességet mutatott, és nagyon jól használható gyors tempójú játékokhoz. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (32.8 ms). | ||
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
ℹ
A képernyő tompításához egyes notebookok egyszerűen be- és kikapcsolják a háttérvilágítást gyors egymásutánban - ez az úgynevezett impulzusszélesség-moduláció (PWM) módszer. Ennek a ciklikus frekvenciának ideális esetben az emberi szem számára nem észlelhetőnek kell lennie. Ha ez a frekvencia túl alacsony, az érzékeny szemű felhasználóknak megerőltető lehet, fejfájást okozhat, vagy akár észre is vehetik a villódzást.| Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX: Ø4276 (4198.59-4320.12)
Alienware x16 R1 Intel Core i9-13900HK: Ø2834 (2768.93-2949.63)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4469 (4358.72-4684.94)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX; turbo: Ø4509 (4425.76-4764.17)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4416 (1123.72-4730.93)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
| Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... a kisebb jobb
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 8867 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
* ... a kisebb jobb
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7035 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5727 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
721.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
625.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
4261 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
5182 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
67.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
218.4 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Alienware m16 R1 AMD: Ø6478 (5060.01-6504.73)
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W -1! | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE -2! | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti -1! | |
| HP Omen Transcend 16 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 -2! | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE -1! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 40681 pontok | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 35751 pontok | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 17719 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
* ... a kisebb jobb
Far Cry 5 | The Witcher 3 | F1 22 | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | Returnal | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | Strange Brigade
| Far Cry 5 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (122 - 179, n=10) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (114 - 162, n=11) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (114 - 157, n=10) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (71 - 97, n=6) | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.5 (74-180)
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø163.4 (153-172)
| alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 573.1 | 452.2 | 349.3 | 169.7 | 121.5 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 229 | 191.8 | 180.4 | 164.7 | 161 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 230 | 218 | 167.6 | 131.6 | 76.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 171.1 | 149 | 113.1 | 95 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 160 | 145 | 141 | 136 | 131 | 91 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 572 | 461 | 400 | 357 | 248 | 123.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 154 | 151.4 | 137.5 | 128.3 | 84.5 | 39.7 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 317.1 | 265.9 | 201.1 | 160.8 | 112.9 | 59 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 323 | 296 | 285 | 124.2 | 78.1 | 39.5 |
| Returnal (2023) | 128 | 122 | 117 | 107 | 80 | 44 |
Zajszint
| Üresjárat |
| 22.9 / 29.7 / 29.7 dB(A) |
| Terhelés |
| 29.8 / 54.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm távolságról) környezeti zaj: 22.9 dB(A) | ||
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, R9 7845HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Alienware x16 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HK, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -11% | -17% | -9% | 4% | |
| off / környezet * | 22.9 | 22.7 1% | 22.9 -0% | 25 -9% | 25 -9% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 22.9 | 23.1 -1% | 29.1 -27% | 28 -22% | 26 -14% | 23 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 29.7 | 25.8 13% | 29.1 2% | 30 -1% | 28 6% | 23 23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.7 | 25.8 13% | 29.1 2% | 38 -28% | 30 -1% | 23.6 21% |
| Load Average * | 29.8 | 39.3 -32% | 45.7 -53% | 48 -61% | 48 -61% | 39 -31% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.7 | 49.9 9% | 54.3 1% | 53 3% | 49 10% | 51.6 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 54.7 | 54.8 -0% | 54.3 1% | 55 -1% | 52 5% | 51.3 6% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Alienware x16 R1 Intel Core i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | 1% | -10% | -6% | 12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48 | 47.2 2% | 47.4 1% | 53 -10% | 54 -13% | 40 17% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 39 | 47.8 -23% | 54.4 -39% | 59 -51% | 55 -41% | 37.6 4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 37 | 36.8 1% | 28.4 23% | 34 8% | 29 22% | 32.4 12% |
| Idle Bottom * | 36.2 | 35.8 1% | 29.2 19% | 32 12% | 33 9% | 31.4 13% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Frekvenciadiagram (a jelölőnégyzetek be- és kipipálhatók az eszközök összehasonlításához)
Alienware m16 R1 AMD audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energiafogyasztás
| Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 1.1 / 1.8 Watt |
| Üresjárat | 39 / 44.6 / 68.1 Watt |
| Terhelés |
129.8 / 327.3 Watt |
   
| |
Kulcs:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | 27% | 23% | 35% | 29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 39 | 25.2 35% | 19.2 51% | 20 49% | 10 74% | 15.2 61% |
| Idle Average * | 44.6 | 29.9 33% | 22.7 49% | 25 44% | 16 64% | 22.8 49% |
| Idle Maximum * | 68.1 | 49.8 27% | 55.4 19% | 35 49% | 27 60% | 49.8 27% |
| Load Average * | 129.8 | 105.4 19% | 128.4 1% | 136 -5% | 129 1% | 121.2 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 285 | 263 8% | 206 28% | 282 1% | 247 13% | 242 15% |
| Load Maximum * | 327.3 | 313.8 4% | 292 11% | 320 2% | 342 -4% | 273.7 16% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø285 (276-295)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø262 (260-266)
Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø277 (203-327)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø287 (278-327)
Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø41.9 (27.1-66)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø17.2 (14.8-22.6)
Power Consumption external Monitor
Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø190.6 (185.5-203)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø157.2 (155-164.7)
Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø207 (206-208)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø187.3 (172.4-195.5)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø71.9 (70.8-86)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø158.5 (149.9-171.1)
Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø266 (261-272)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø242 (225-263)
Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø274 (264-281)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø257 (253-260)
Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø39.7 (25.3-61.5)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø28.9 (22.6-43.7)
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akkumulátor üzemidő | 13% | 39% | 38% | 97% | 84% | |
| Reader / Idle | 239 | 436 82% | 375 57% | 533 123% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 224 | 149 -33% | 250 12% | 308 38% | 583 160% | 365 63% |
| Load | 49 | 44 -10% | 73 49% | 65 33% | 81 65% |
Pro
+ QHD+ kijelző P3 színekkel és gyors válaszidővel
+ nagyon nagy teljesítmény még Kiegyensúlyozott (Balanced) módban is
+ játékhoz és tartalomkészítéshez egyaránt kiváló
+ nagy CPU és GPU hőtermelés
+ akár három M.2 SSD is
Kontra
- nagy energiafogyasztás; gyenge üzemidő
- nagy hálózati adapter; nincs GaN adapter opció
- nincs USB4 vagy G-Sync
- nagy és súlyos
- szoftverhibák
Összegzés — Gyors és Funkciókban Gazdag, de Optimalizálásra Szorul
Az Alienware m16 R1 eszméletlenül nagy teljesítményt és funkciót zsúfol egy 16 hüvelykes laptopba. Folyékony fémről, gőzkamráról, négy ventilátorról, 3 SSD helyről, CherryMX mechanikus billentyűzetről, 175 W-os grafikus teljesítményről, bővíthető RAM-ról, sőt Intel és AMD CPU és GPU opciókról is beszélünk. A konkurens 16 hüvelykes gamer modellek, mint a HP Omen Transcend 16, a Razer Blade 16, vagy az Asus Zephyrus M16 ennél kisebb felszereltségűek, és általában lassúbbak is, annak ellenére, hogy ugyanazzal a GPU-val vannak felszerelve, mint a mi konfigurációnk. Az Alienware mérnökei nagy dicséretet érdemelnek, tekintve, hogy az Alienware m16 R1 mennyire sűrűn telepített.
Másrészt a beépített funkciók hosszú listája a laptop ellen is dolgozhat, mivel az Alienware m16 jóval nehezebb és nagyobb is, mint sok más alternatíva. Különösen az üzemidő szenved elég erősen, függetlenül az üzemmód profil beállításától. Akinek fontos a hordozhatóság, annak talán máshol érdemes keresgélnie. Ráadásul a modellből még mindig hiányzik néhány népszerű funkció, mint például az OLED és a mini-LED.
Az Alienware m16 R1 egyértelműen gyors és funkciókban gazdag, összességében átlagon felüli eredményekkel. A teljesítménybeli előnyök ára viszont a nagyobb súly és a nagyobb méret.
Említést érdemelnek az értékelésünk során tapasztalt hibák is. 4K videolejátszás közben a képkockák kihagyása, a játék közbeni képkockasebesség akadozása és az alvó állapotból való ébredéskor jelentkező problémák elég sajnálatosak, főleg, mivel az Alienware elvileg rajongóknak szóló márka. Talán a Dell egy kicsit nagyobb falatot harapott le, mint amekkorát meg tudna rágni a sok Intel-Nvidia, AMD-Nvidia és AMD-AMD konfigurációval, ami eléggé megnehezítheti a hibaelhárítást.
Ár és Elérhetőség
A Dell-nél most Intel és AMD változatban egyaránt elérhető az Alienware m16 modell. Az AMD-s verzió 1700 dollártól indul, és az ár teljesen konfigurálva 3000-4000 dollár fölé emelkedik.
Alienware m16 R1 AMD
- 08/23/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
